首页> 外文期刊>Circulation journal >Estimation of Cardiac Event Risk by Gated Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Quantitative Scoring Methods Based on a Multi-Center J-ACCESS Database
【24h】

Estimation of Cardiac Event Risk by Gated Myocardial Perfusion Imaging and Quantitative Scoring Methods Based on a Multi-Center J-ACCESS Database

机译:基于多中心J-ACCESS数据库的门控心肌灌注成像和定量评分方法估算心脏事件风险

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has been used to estimate cardiac event risk. The aim of the present study is to achieve stable risk estimation based on perfusion scoring and a multi-center prognostic database. Methods and Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate cardiac event risk based on a J-ACCESS study. A stress-MPI was performed in 45 patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and in 25 non-CAD patients. Perfusion defect scoring of summed stress score (SSS) was performed by 5 methods: (1) visual scoring; (2) automatic scoring of 3 short-axis and 1 vertical long-axis slices; (3) visual modification of Method 2; (4) automatic polar map scoring based on a Japanese multi-center database; and (5) visual modification of Method 4. Agreement of SSS between 2 observers was good (r=0.87-0.97). Agreement of estimated cardiac event risk between observers and among 5 methods was very good (r=0.99-1.00). Regarding diagnostic accuracy for CAD, Method 5 showed optimal diagnostic yields (sensitivity 84%, accuracy 77%). Conclusions: Estimation of cardiac event risk in conjunction with polar map segmentation and common normal databases resulted in stable risk values, and might be used for risk stratification in patients suspected of having CAD. ( Circ J 2011; 75: 2417-2423)
机译:背景:心肌灌注成像(MPI)已用于估计心脏事件的风险。本研究的目的是基于灌注评分和多中心预后数据库来实现稳定的风险估计。方法和结果:基于J-ACCESS研究,进行了多元logistic回归分析以评估心脏事件风险。在45例冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者和25例非CAD患者中进行了应激MPI。总应力评分(SSS)的灌注缺陷评分采用5种方法进行:(1)视觉评分; (2)自动计分3个短轴和1个垂直长轴切片; (3)方法2的外观修改; (4)基于日本多中心数据库的极地地图自动评分; (5)方法4的可视化修改。2个观察者之间的SSS一致性很好(r = 0.87-0.97)。观察者之间和5种方法中估计的心脏事件风险的一致性非常好(r = 0.99-1.00)。关于CAD的诊断准确性,方法5显示出最佳的诊断产率(灵敏度为84%,准确性为77%)。结论:结合极谱图分割和常用正常数据库来估计心脏事件风险可产生稳定的风险值,并可用于怀疑患有CAD的患者的风险分层。 (Circ J 2011; 75:2417-2423)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号