...
首页> 外文期刊>Civil Engineering and Architecture >Optimum Ductility Assessment of Earthquake Resistant Structures
【24h】

Optimum Ductility Assessment of Earthquake Resistant Structures

机译:抗震结构的最佳延性评估

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Provision of ductility in the structures according to the modern design codes lead to more economic constructions, while safety levels reach higher rates. The philosophy is based into allowing some damage to occur in predetermined elements where enough ductility has been provided in order to ensure the member’s capacity during an earthquake. This research focuses on investigating optimum ductility provisions for buildings to achieve the desired performance. The aim is to assess the parameters which affect ductility demands and overall present a comprehensive methodology for evaluating the structural performance. Analytical work was based on the comparison of two 4-storey reinforced concrete buildings designed as high ductility class (DCH) and medium ductility class (DCM) upon a strong rock (Ground type A, Eurocode 8 soil classification)according to the Eurocode 8. For a fair comparison both buildings were designed to have same vibration frequencies in order to experience same energy release rates under a number of earthquakes with varied ground acceleration amplitudes and frequency spectrums. The main criteria for the comparison were: (i) the inter-storey drifts, (ii) the energy distribution among the floors, (iii) the structural damage in terms of plastic hinges initiation and ductility demand rates, (iv) total energy dissipation and (v) top floor displacements. The damage rates in the structures were found to be directly correlated to the earthquake’s frequency range. Low frequency seismic events corresponding to high periods in the elastic response spectrum used for the design of the structures were more catastrophic. The paper proved that DCH buildings perform generally better than DCM for high ground acceleration amplitudes, while for smaller GAA where the responses are governed by the stiffness in the elastic response range the DCM structures have functional superiority. Higher ductility provisions have been found beneficial for the structural performance, especially for higher ductility demands caused by higher intensity earthquakes with increased return periods and ground acceleration amplitudes.
机译:根据现代设计规范,在结构中提供延展性可带来更经济的结构,同时安全级别可达到更高的比率。该理念的基础是允许在预定的元素中发生一些损坏,这些元素已经提供了足够的延展性,以确保成员在地震中的承受能力。这项研究专注于调查建筑物的最佳延展性规定,以实现所需的性能。目的是评估影响延性要求的参数,并总体上提出一种评估结构性能的综合方法。分析工作的基础是,根据欧洲规范8,比较在坚固岩石(A型地面,欧洲规范8土级)上的两座4层高钢筋混凝土建筑,将其设计为高延展性等级(DCH)和中延性等级(DCM)。为了公平地比较,两座建筑物被设计为具有相同的振动频率,以便在具有不同的地面加速度振幅和频谱的多次地震下经历相同的能量释放速率。比较的主要标准是:(i)层间漂移,(ii)地板之间的能量分布,(iii)根据塑料铰链起爆和延性需求率的结构破坏,(iv)总能量耗散(v)顶层位移。发现建筑物中的损坏率与地震的频率范围直接相关。与用于结构设计的弹性响应谱中的高周期相对应的低频地震事件更具灾难性。本文证明,对于高地面加速度振幅,DCH建筑物的性能通常优于DCM,而对于较小的GAA,在GAA中,响应由弹性响应范围内的刚度控制,DCM结构具有功能优势。已经发现较高的延展性规定对结构性能有利,特别是对于由于强度增加的地震,返回周期和地面加速度振幅增加而引起的较高延性要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号