首页> 外文期刊>Circulation journal >Clinical Outcome of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators With Recalled and Non-Recalled Leads in Japanese Patients – Increased Failure Rate of The Sprint Fidelis Lead –
【24h】

Clinical Outcome of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators With Recalled and Non-Recalled Leads in Japanese Patients – Increased Failure Rate of The Sprint Fidelis Lead –

机译:在日本患者中,带有可回收和不可回收导线的植入式心脏复律除颤器的临床结果– Sprint Fidelis导线的失败率增加–

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: ?In recent years, there has been a series of recalls of popular implantable cardioverter defibrillators leads, and several reports have demonstrated an increasing rate of failure of such leads over time in Caucasian patients. However, little is known about the performance of these leads in Asian patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of failure of the recalled leads and the characteristics as compared with non-recalled leads in Japanese patients. Methods and Results: ?A retrospective chart review was conducted in 214 patients (75 Sprint Fidelis, 8 Riata, and 131 Sprint Quattro leads) who underwent implantation and follow-up at Nagoya University Hospital. During the follow-up period, 14 Sprint Fidelis leads (19%) and 1 Riata lead (13%) failed, but no abnormality was found in the Sprint Quattro, non-recalled leads. Five patients (4 Sprint Fidelis and 1 Riata, 33% of lead failure patients) received inappropriate shocks. The 3-, 4-, and 5-year lead survival rates in Sprint Fidelis leads were 95.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 89.6%–100%), 89.8% (95% CI: 82.1%–97.6%), and 88.0% (95% CI: 79.6%–96.4%), respectively. A previous device implantation before Sprint Fidelis lead was the only significant predictor for lead fracture (hazard ratio, 5.33; 95% CI: 1.55–18.4; P=0.008). Conclusions: ?The rate of Sprint Fidelis lead failure continues to increase over time in Japanese patients.??( Circ J ?2014; 78: 353–359)
机译:背景:?近年来,已召回了一系列流行的植入式心脏复律除颤器导线,并且有几篇报告表明,随着时间的流逝,白种人患者中此类导线的失败率越来越高。但是,对于这些导线在亚洲患者中的表现知之甚少。这项研究的目的是调查与日本患者相比,未召回的导线与召回导线的失败率及其特征。方法和结果:回顾性调查了在名古屋大学医院接受植入和随访的214例患者(75名Sprint Fidelis,8名Riata和131名Sprint Quattro主管)。在随访期间,有14条Sprint Fidelis引线(19%)和1条Riata引线(13%)发生故障,但在Sprint Quattro(未召回的引线)中未发现异常。五名患者(4名Sprint Fidelis和1名Riata,占铅衰竭患者的33%)受到了不适当的电击。 Sprint Fidelis线索的3年,4年和5年线索生存率分别为95.1%(95%置信区间[CI]:89.6%–100%),89.8%(95%CI:82.1%–97.6%)和88.0%(95%CI:79.6%–96.4%)。 Sprint Fidelis铅之前的先前装置植入是铅断裂的唯一重要预测指标(危险比,5.33; 95%CI:1.55-18.4; P = 0.008)。结论:?日本患者的Sprint Fidelis导联失败率随着时间的推移持续增加。(Circ J?2014; 78:353–359)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号