首页> 外文期刊>Chiropractic and Manual Therapies >The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: Can low back pain patterns be predicted from the first consultation with a chiropractor? A longitudinal pilot study
【24h】

The Nordic back pain subpopulation program: Can low back pain patterns be predicted from the first consultation with a chiropractor? A longitudinal pilot study

机译:北欧背痛亚人群计划:可以从与脊医的第一次会诊中预测腰痛的类型吗?纵向试验研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background It is widely believed that non-specific low back pain (LBP) consists of a number of subgroups which should be identified in order to improve treatment effects. In order to identify subgroups, patient characteristics that relate to different outcomes are searched for. However, LBP is often fluctuating or recurring rather than clearly limited in time. Therefore it would be relevant to consider outcome after completed treatment from a longitudinal perspective (describing "course patterns") instead of defining it from an arbitrarily selected end-point. Aims The objectives of this pilot study were to investigate the interobserver reliability of a diagnostic classification system and to evaluate whether diagnostic classes or other baseline characteristics are associated with the LBP course pattern over a period of 18 weeks. Methods Patients visiting one of 7 chiropractors because of LBP were classified according to a diagnostic classification system, which includes end-range loading, SI-joint pain provocation tests, neurological examination and tests for muscle tenderness and abnormal nerve tension. In addition, age, gender, duration of pain and presence of leg pain were registered in the patient's file. By weekly SMS-messages on their mobile phones, patients were asked how many days they had LBP the preceding week, and these answers were transformed into pain course patterns and the total number of LBP days. Results A total of 110 patients were included and 76 (69%) completed follow-up. Thirty-five patients were examined by two chiropractors. The agreement regarding diagnostic classes was 83% (95% CI: 70 - 96). The diagnostic classes were associated with the pain course patterns and number of LBP days. Patients with disc pain had the highest number of LBP days and patients with muscular pain reported the fewest (35 vs. 12 days, p Conclusions The study indicated that there is a clinically meaningful relationship between diagnostic classes and the course of LBP. This should be evaluated in more depth.
机译:背景技术人们普遍认为,非特异性下背痛(LBP)由许多亚组组成,应提高治疗效果。为了识别亚组,搜索与不同结果相关的患者特征。但是,LBP经常波动或反复发生,而不是时间明显受限。因此,有必要从纵向角度(描述“病程模式”)考虑完成治疗后的结果,而不是从任意选择的终点来定义结果。目的这项初步研究的目的是调查诊断分类系统的观察者间可靠性,并评估在18周内诊断类别或其他基线特征是否与LBP病程相关。方法根据诊断分类系统对因LBP而就诊的7名脊医中的一名进行分类,包括终端范围负荷,SI关节疼痛激发试验,神经系统检查以及肌肉压痛和神经张力异常的检查。此外,患者的档案中还记录了年龄,性别,疼痛持续时间和腿痛的存在。通过手机上的每周SMS消息,询问患者前一周有LBP的天数,并将这些答案转换为疼痛过程模式和LBP天数的总数。结果共纳入110例患者,完成76例(69%)随访。两名脊医检查了35名患者。有关诊断类别的协议为83%(95%CI:70-96)。诊断类别与疼痛过程模式和LBP天数相关。椎间盘疼痛患者的LBP天数最多,而肌肉疼痛患者的最少(35天vs. 12天,p)结论结论该研究表明诊断级别与LBP病程之间存在临床上有意义的关系。评估更深入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号