This study sought to conduct a review of content validity, which is an important phase of processes of construction and adaptation of measurem'/> Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments
首页> 外文期刊>Ciencia e Saude Coletiva >Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments
【24h】

Content validity in the development and adaptation processes of measurement instruments

机译:测量仪器开发和适应过程中的内容有效性

获取原文
       

摘要

> face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2"> This study sought to conduct a review of content validity, which is an important phase of processes of construction and adaptation of measurement instruments. Research of comprehensive literature was conducted by means of a review of national and international databases. Initially, a description of the conceptual basis and the measurement methods used in content validity was made, with emphasis on its application in the healthcare area. It was seen that controversy exists in the literature on the terminology and concept of content validity. The recommended procedures used to check content validity during the construction and adaptation processes of instruments were described, especially the judges' assessment, which can involve qualitative and quantitative procedures. The number, selection and qualification of these judges were also described. The different methods used to quantify the level of agreement among the experts were verified, mainly the Content Validity Index (CVI). This study described aspects of the content validity process, one of the procedures to be considered by healthcare researchers and professionals who are interested in using reliable and appropriate measurements and instruments scales for given population groups. 
机译:> face =“ Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif” size =“ 2”>这项研究试图对内容有效性进行审查,这是构建和调整测量仪器过程的重要阶段。全面文献的研究是通过审查国家和国际数据库进行的。最初,对内容有效性中使用的概念基础和测量方法进行了描述,重点是其在医疗保健领域中的应用。可以看出,关于内容有效性的术语和概念的文献存在争议。描述了在仪器构建和修改过程中用于检查内容有效性的推荐程序,尤其是法官的评估,其中可能涉及定性和定量程序。还描述了这些法官的人数,选择和资格。验证了用于量化专家之间的共识程度的不同方法,主要是内容有效性指数(CVI)。这项研究描述了内容有效性过程的各个方面,这是有兴趣对给定的人群使用可靠和适当的测量和仪器量表的医疗研究人员和专业人员要考虑的程序之一。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号