...
首页> 外文期刊>Chiropractic and Manual Therapies >Pain patterns and descriptions in patients with radicular pain: Does the pain necessarily follow a specific dermatome?
【24h】

Pain patterns and descriptions in patients with radicular pain: Does the pain necessarily follow a specific dermatome?

机译:放射状疼痛患者的疼痛模式和描述:疼痛是否一定要遵循特定的皮肤刀?

获取原文

摘要

Background It is commonly stated that nerve root pain should be expected to follow a specific dermatome and that this information is useful to make the diagnosis of radiculopathy. There is little evidence in the literature that confirms or denies this statement. The purpose of this study is to describe and discuss the diagnostic utility of the distribution of pain in patients with cervical and lumbar radicular pain. Methods Pain drawings and descriptions were assessed in consecutive patients diagnosed with cervical or lumbar nerve root pain. These findings were compared with accepted dermatome maps to determine whether they tended to follow along the involved nerve root's dermatome. Results Two hundred twenty-six nerve roots in 169 patients were assessed. Overall, pain related to cervical nerve roots was non-dermatomal in over two-thirds (69.7%) of cases. In the lumbar spine, the pain was non-dermatomal in just under two-thirds (64.1%) of cases. The majority of nerve root levels involved non-dermatomal pain patterns except C4 (60.0% dermatomal) and S1 (64.9% dermatomal). The sensitivity (SE) and specificity (SP) for dermatomal pattern of pain are low for all nerve root levels with the exception of the C4 level (Se 0.60, Sp 0.72) and S1 level (Se 0.65, Sp 0.80), although in the case of the C4 level, the number of subjects was small (n = 5). Conclusion In most cases nerve root pain should not be expected to follow along a specific dermatome, and a dermatomal distribution of pain is not a useful historical factor in the diagnosis of radicular pain. The possible exception to this is the S1 nerve root, in which the pain does commonly follow the S1 dermatome.
机译:背景技术通常认为神经根痛应遵循特定的皮肤刀,并且该信息对诊断神经根病很有用。文献中几乎没有证据可以证实或否认这一说法。这项研究的目的是描述和讨论颈椎和腰部神经根痛患者的疼痛分布的诊断实用性。方法对连续诊断为颈或腰神经根痛的患者进行疼痛附图和描述的评估。将这些发现与公认的皮刀图进行比较,以确定它们是否倾向于沿着受累神经根的皮刀。结果评估169例患者的206根神经根。总体而言,与宫颈神经根相关的疼痛在超过三分之二(69.7%)的病例中是非皮肤性的。在腰椎中,只有不到三分之二(64.1%)的病例是非皮肤疼痛。除了C4(占皮肤的60.0%)和S1(占皮肤的64.9%)以外,大多数神经根水平都涉及非皮肤疼痛模式。除了C4水平(Se 0.60,Sp 0.72)和S1水平(Se 0.65,Sp 0.80)以外,所有神经根水平对皮肤痛模式的敏感性(SE)和特异性(SP)均较低。在C4级的情况下,受试者人数很少(n = 5)。结论在大多数情况下,不应预期神经根疼痛会伴随特定的皮肤刀发生,并且疼痛的经皮分布并不是诊断神经根痛的有用的历史因素。可能的例外是S1神经根,疼痛通常发生在S1皮肤刀之后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号