首页> 外文期刊>Chinese journal of cancer >Prospective, single-center cohort study analyzing the efficacy of complete laparoscopic resection on recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma
【24h】

Prospective, single-center cohort study analyzing the efficacy of complete laparoscopic resection on recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma

机译:前瞻性,单中心队列研究分析了完全腹腔镜切除术对复发性肝细胞癌的疗效

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BackgroundLaparoscopic hepatectomy is increasingly being used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, few studies have examined the treatment of recurrent HCC in patients who received a prior hepatectomy. The present prospective study compared the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic surgery with conventional open surgery in HCC patients with postoperative tumor recurrence. MethodsWe conducted a prospective study of 64 patients, all of whom had undergone open surgery once before, who were diagnosed with recurrent HCC between June 2014 and November 2014. The laparoscopic group ( n =?31) underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy, and the control group ( n =?33) underwent conventional open surgery. Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, surgical margins, postoperative pain scores, postoperative time until the patient could walk, anal exsufflation time, length of hospital stay, and inpatient costs were compared between the two groups. The patients were followed up for 1?year after surgery, and relapse-free survival was compared between the two groups. ResultsAll surgeries were successfully completed. No conversion to open surgery occurred in the laparoscopic group, and no serious postoperative complications occurred in either group. No significant difference in inpatient costs was found between the laparoscopic group and the control group ( P =?0.079), but significant differences between the two groups were observed for operation time (116.7?±?37.5 vs. 148.2?±?46.7?min, P =?0.031), intraoperative blood loss (117.5?±?35.5 vs. 265.9?±?70.3?mL, P =?0.012), postoperative time until the patient could walk (1.6?±?0.6 vs. 2.2?±?0.8?days, P ?0.05) between the patients with contralateral HCC recurrence ( n =?18) and those with ipsilateral HCC recurrence ( n =?13). However, intraoperative blood loss was significantly less (97.7?±?14.0 vs. 186.3?±?125.6?mL, P =?0.012) and the hospital stay was significantly shorter (4.2?±?0.7 vs. 6.1?±?1.7?days, P =?0.021) for the patients with contralateral recurrence than for those with ipsilateral recurrence. ConclusionsFor the patients who previously underwent conventional open surgical resection of HCC, complete laparoscopic resection was safe and effective for recurrent HCC and resulted in a shorter operation time, less intraoperative blood loss, and a faster postoperative recovery than conventional open surgery. Laparoscopic resection was especially advantageous for the patients with contralateral HCC recurrence.
机译:背景技术腹腔镜肝切除术越来越多地用于治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)。但是,很少有研究检查过接受肝切除术的患者复发性HCC的治疗。本前瞻性研究比较了腹腔镜手术与常规开放手术在HCC术后肿瘤复发中的临床疗效。方法我们对2014年6月至2014年11月之间被诊断患有HCC复发的64例患者进行了前瞻性研究。所有患者均接受腹腔镜肝切除术(n =?31),对照组(n = 31)。 n =?33)接受常规的开放性手术。比较两组患者的手术时间,术中失血量,手术切缘,术后疼痛评分,患者行走之前的术后时间,肛门排便时间,住院时间和住院费用。术后对患者进行了1年的随访,比较了两组的无复发生存率。结果所有手术均已成功完成。腹腔镜组未发生开腹手术,两组均未发生严重的术后并发症。腹腔镜组与对照组的住院费用没有显着差异(P =?0.079),但两组的手术时间却有显着差异(116.7?±?37.5 vs. 148.2?±?46.7?min)。 ,P =?0.031),术中失血量(117.5?±?35.5 vs. 265.9?±?70.3?mL,P =?0.012),术后患者可以行走的时间(1.6?±?0.6 vs. 2.2?±)。对侧HCC复发患者(n = 18)与同侧HCC复发患者(n = 13)之间的差异为0.8天(P = 0.05)。但是,术中失血量明显减少(97.7±±14.0 vs. 186.3±±125.6?mL,P =±0.012),住院时间明显缩短(4.2±±0.7 vs. 6.1±±1.7?对侧复发患者的天数,P =?0.021)。结论对于以前接受过HCC常规开放性手术切除的患者,完全腹腔镜切除术对于复发性HCC是安全有效的,与传统的开放性手术相比,手术时间更短,术中出血更少,术后恢复更快。腹腔镜切除术对侧HCC复发患者尤其有利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号