首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Medicine >Lenalidomide versus lenalidomide?+?dexamethasone prolonged treatment after second‐line lenalidomide?+?dexamethasone induction in multiple myeloma
【24h】

Lenalidomide versus lenalidomide?+?dexamethasone prolonged treatment after second‐line lenalidomide?+?dexamethasone induction in multiple myeloma

机译:来那度胺与来那度胺+地塞米松二线诱导治疗多发性骨髓瘤后延长治疗时间

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Lenalidomide (Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). It is possible that single‐agent Len may be effective as prolonged treatment regimen in RRMM once patients demonstrate an initial response to Len+Dex induction. Patients with RRMM who responded to first‐line Len+Dex in an observational study (NCT01430546) received up to 24 cycles of either Len (25?mg/day) or Len+Dex (25?mg/day and 40?mg/week) as prolonged treatment in a subsequent phase 2 clinical trial (NCT01450215). In the observational study ( N ?=?133), median time to response was 1.7 (range 0.6–9.6) months. A complete response to all treatments received in both studies was observed in 11% of patients; very good partial response and partial response rates were 31% and 38%, respectively. Corresponding response rates in the subgroup of patients who did not enter the phase 2 trial ( n ?=?71) were 3%, 18%, and 39%, respectively. Rates of disease progression at 2?years in the phase 2 trial were 47% versus 31% for Len versus Len+Dex ( P ?=?0.14). After 36?months median follow‐up in surviving patients, median time to progression was not reached with Len+Dex and was 24.9?months (95% confidence interval 12.5–not calculable, P ??0.001) with Len. Three‐year OS among the total observational study population was 61% (95% CI, 52–69%). The corresponding rate among patients who entered the phase 2 clinical trial was 73% (95% CI, 60–83%) and was significantly lower among those patients who achieved ≥PR but did not proceed into the phase 2 trial (55%; P ?=?0.01). In the phase 2 trial, OS was 73% in both treatment arms ( P ?=?0.70). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common with prolonged (phase 2 trial) versus short‐term (observational study) Len administration but remained manageable. Prolonged treatment with Len with or without Dex provides sustained, clinically relevant responses and demonstrates an acceptable safety profile.
机译:来那度胺(Len)加地塞米松(Dex)被批准用于治疗复发性或难治性多发性骨髓瘤(RRMM)。一旦患者表现出对Len + Dex诱导的初始反应,单药Len可能作为RRMM中的延长治疗方案有效。在一项观察性研究(NCT01430546)中对一线Len + Dex产生反应的RRMM患者接受Len(25?mg /天)或Len + Dex(25?mg /天和40?mg /周)的多达24个周期的治疗)作为后续2期临床试验(NCT01450215)中的延长治疗。在观察性研究中(N = 133),中位反应时间为1.7(0.6-9.6)个月。 11%的患者对两项研究中接受的所有治疗均获得了完全缓解;很好的部分反应率和部分反应率分别为31%和38%。未参加2期试验的患者亚组中的相应缓解率(n =≥71)分别为3%,18%和39%。在2期临床试验中,在2年时的疾病进展率为47%,而Len与Len + Dex则为31%(P = 0.14)。对存活患者进行36个月的中位随访后,Len + Dex未达到中位进展时间,而Len则为24.9个月(95%置信区间12.5-无法计算,P 0.001)。在所有观察性研究人群中,三年OS为61%(95%CI,52-69%)。进入2期临床试验的患者中的相应比率为73%(95%CI,60-83%),而在≥≥PR但未进行2期临床试验的患者中,相应的比率显着较低(55%; P ?=?0.01)。在2期试验中,两个治疗组的OS均为73%(P = 0.70)。长期(2期试验)与短期(观察性研究)Len给药相比,中性粒细胞减少症和血小板减少症更为常见,但仍可控制。 Len含或不含Dex的长期治疗可提供持续的临床相关反应,并显示出可接受的安全性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号