首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Management and Research >Gain and loss from transcatheter intra-arterial limb infusion of cisplatin for extremity osteosarcoma: a retrospective study of 99 cases in the past six years
【24h】

Gain and loss from transcatheter intra-arterial limb infusion of cisplatin for extremity osteosarcoma: a retrospective study of 99 cases in the past six years

机译:经导管动脉内四肢输注顺铂治疗四肢骨肉瘤的收益和损失:过去六年中99例回顾性研究

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose: We intend to analyze the gain and loss from transcatheter intra-arterial (IA) limb infusion of cisplatin for extremity osteosarcoma in the past six years. Patients and methods: Between December 2009 and August 2014, a total of 99 patients were analyzed for efficiency and followed up for long-term survival. Based on the different administration methods of cisplatin, we divided them into the following two cohorts: IA infusion of cisplatin (n=48) and intravenous (IV) infusion of cisplatin (n=51). Except for cisplatin, all the other drugs were given intravenously. Cisplatin was given intra-arterially with an infusion time of 3 hrs or 6 hrs using a pump, whereas historical controls received IV infusion of cisplatin within 60 mins. Tumor neovascularity (TNV) was analyzed before infusion, and subsequent arteriograms were compared with the baseline to determine percent changes. Definitive surgery with intended wide resection and postoperative pathological evaluation were performed in all these patients. Results: No local or overall survival benefit was found in the patients preoperatively treated with IA infusion of cisplatin compared with IV infusion ( P= 0.336 and 0.173, respectively). Furthermore, serial arteriography was used to predict a good histologic response with an accuracy of 73.1% and a sensitivity of 100%. There were sporadic cases with the telangiectatic subtype, which did not respond very well to IV chemotherapy, but later, the tumor obviously shrank after IA infusion of cisplatin. Our study also showed that the rates of the complication of skin and muscle necrosis were not so low as reported. Conclusion: We did not observe any survival advantage of chemotherapy using IA infusion in osteosarcoma of the extremities. Arteriography for TNV can be used to predict the tumor histologic response. Malposition of the catheter might severely increase the complication of skin or muscle necrosis.
机译:目的:我们打算分析过去六年来经导管动脉内(IA)肢体输注顺铂治疗四肢骨肉瘤的收益和损失。患者和方法:在2009年12月至2014年8月之间,共对99名患者进行了效率分析,并随访了其长期生存率。根据顺铂的不同给药方法,我们将其分为以下两个队列:IA输注顺铂(n = 48)和静脉输注(IV)顺铂(n = 51)。除顺铂外,其他所有药物均静脉注射。使用泵在动脉内输注顺铂3个小时或6个小时,而历史对照组则在60分钟内静脉输注了顺铂。在输注之前对肿瘤新血管形成(TNV)进行了分析,并将随后的动脉造影与基线进行比较,以确定百分比变化。所有这些患者均行了明确的手术,打算进行广泛的切除术并进行术后病理评估。结果:IA输注顺铂与IV输注相比,术前未发现局部或总体生存获益(分别为P = 0.336和0.173)。此外,串行动脉造影用于预测良好的组织学反应,其准确性为73.1%,灵敏度为100%。有散发性的毛细血管扩张亚型病例,对静脉化疗的反应不佳,但后来,在IA输注顺铂后肿瘤明显缩小。我们的研究还表明,皮肤和肌肉坏死的并发症发生率没有报告的那么低。结论:我们没有观察到IA输注化疗在四肢骨肉瘤中具有任何生存优势。 TNV的动脉造影可用于预测肿瘤的组织学反应。导管位置不正确可能会严重增加皮肤或肌肉坏死的并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号