首页> 外文期刊>Buildings >Comparative Evaluation of Structural Systems for Tapered Tall Buildings
【24h】

Comparative Evaluation of Structural Systems for Tapered Tall Buildings

机译:锥形高层建筑结构系统的比较评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Structural efficiency of tapered tall buildings has been well recognized, and many tall buildings of tapered forms have been built throughout the world. Tall buildings are built with an enormous amount of building materials. As one of the most efficient structural forms for tall buildings, the contribution of tapered forms to saving structural materials coming from our limited natural resources could be significant. Structural design of tall buildings is generally governed by lateral stiffness rather than strength. This paper systematically studies the structural efficiency of tapered tall buildings in terms of lateral stiffness. Tall buildings of various heights and angles of taper are designed with different structural systems prevalently used for today’s tall buildings, such as diagrids, braced tubes, and core-outrigger systems. The heights of the studied buildings range from 60 to 100 stories, and the corresponding height-to-width aspect ratios in their non-tapered prismatic forms range from 6.5 to 10.8. The angles of taper studied are 1, 2, and 3 degrees. Gross floor area of each building of the same story height is maintained to be the same regardless of the different angles of taper. Based on design studies, comparative evaluation of the various structural systems for tapered tall buildings is presented.
机译:锥形高层建筑的结构效率已得到公认,并且世界各地已经建造了许多锥形锥形高层建筑。高层建筑使用大量建筑材料建造。作为高层建筑最有效的结构形式之一,锥形形式对节省有限自然资源中的结构材料的贡献可能是巨大的。高层建筑的结构设计通常由侧向刚度而非强度决定。本文从侧向刚度的角度系统地研究了锥形高层建筑的结构效率。各种高度和锥度的高层建筑都采用了各种结构系统设计,这些结构系统通常用于当今的高层建筑,例如斜方管,支撑管和核心支腿系统。所研究建筑物的高度范围为60到100层,其非锥形棱柱形形式的相应的高宽比为6.5至10.8。研究的锥角为1、2和3度。楼层高度相同的每个建筑物的总建筑面积均保持不变,而不管锥角如何不同。基于设计研究,对锥形高层建筑的各种结构系统进行了比较评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号