...
首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Urological Association Journal >Oncologic outcomes and prognostic impact of urothelial recurrences in patients undergoing segmental and total ureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma
【24h】

Oncologic outcomes and prognostic impact of urothelial recurrences in patients undergoing segmental and total ureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

机译:分段和全输尿管切除术治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的尿路上皮复发的肿瘤学结局和预后影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: We evaluated the impact of urothelial recurrences in a cohort of patients undergoing segmental (SU) and total ureterectomy (TU) as an alternative to nephroureterectomy (NU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Methods: Between 1999 and 2012, patients who underwent SU, TU and NU for treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma were evaluated. Demographic, surgical, pathologic and oncologic data were collected. Recurrence-free (RFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox methods. Results: A total 141 patients were evaluated, 35 underwent SU, 10 TU and 96 NU. Patients who underwent TU were more likely to have bilateral disease ( p < 0.01), solitary kidney ( p < 0.01), and multifocal disease ( p = 0.01). Organ-confined ( p < 0.01) and low-grade disease ( p < 0.01) were more common in the TU and SU groups compared with NU. At a median follow-up of 56.9 months (range: 0.2–181.1) disease relapse occurred in 88 (55.3%) patients. Localized recurrence occurred in 31.1% of SU/TU group compared to 27.1% ( p = 0.62) of the NU group. Neither total nor segmental ureterectomy demonstrated significantly worse RFS ( p = 0.26 and p = 0.81), CSS ( p = 0.96 and p = 0.52) or overall survival ( p = 0.59 and p = 0.55) compared with complete NU. Localized urothelial recurrence did not confer increased risk of cancer-specific ( p = 0.73) or overall mortality ( p = 0.39). The paper’s most important limitations include its retrospective nature and its relatively small number of patients. Conclusion: No significant survival differences were demonstrated between surgical approaches for upper tract urothelial cancer. Localized urothelial recurrence after surgical treatment for upper tract urothelial cancer does not affect mortality in this population. TU with ileal-substitution may provide an alternative option for patients with extensive ureteral disease and poor renal function.
机译:简介:我们评估了尿路复发对部分(SU)和全输尿管切除术(TU)作为上尿路尿路上皮癌的替代肾切除术(NU)的患者队列的影响。方法:从1999年至2012年,对接受SU,TU和NU治疗上尿路尿路上皮癌的患者进行评估。收集了人口,外科,病理和肿瘤学数据。使用Kaplan-Meier和多变量Cox方法分析了无复发(RFS)和疾病特异性生存(DSS)。结果:共评估了141例患者,其中35例接受了SU,10 TU和96 NU。进行TU的患者更有可能患有双侧疾病(p <0.01),孤立肾(p <0.01)和多灶性疾病(p = 0.01)。与NU组相比,TU和SU组的器官受限(p <0.01)和低度疾病(p <0.01)更常见。在中位随访期56.9个月(范围:0.2-181.1)中,有88名患者(55.3%)发生了疾病复发。 SU / TU组的局部复发发生率为31.1%,而NU组为27.1%(p = 0.62)。与完整的NU相比,全输尿管切除术和分段输尿管切除术均未显示RFS(p = 0.26和p = 0.81),CSS(p = 0.96和p = 0.52)或总生存率(p = 0.59和p = 0.55)明显差。局部尿路上皮复发并未赋予患癌症的风险(p = 0.73)或总死亡率(p = 0.39)。该论文最重要的局限性在于其回顾性和相对较少的患者数量。结论:上尿路尿路上皮癌的手术方法之间无明显生存差异。上尿路尿路上皮癌手术治疗后的局部尿路上皮复发不影响该人群的死亡率。回肠替代的TU可以为患有广泛输尿管疾病和肾功能不佳的患者提供另一种选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号