首页> 外文期刊>Cahiers Agricultures >Credit policy to reinforce family farms: Brazil’s experience in the 1990s
【24h】

Credit policy to reinforce family farms: Brazil’s experience in the 1990s

机译:加强家庭农场的信贷政策:巴西在1990年代的经验

获取原文
       

摘要

The Brazilian national program to support family farms (PRONAF) was implemented in 1994 to promote the productive capacity of the rural poor by providing credit to this population with no previous access to formal bank credit. This policy was aimed at reducing inequity and poverty in Brazilian society. It was a huge innovation since agriculture had traditionally been based on large landholdings. The first beneficiaries were small family farmers whose activity was based mainly on family labour, with a maximum annual income of 27 500 reals, at least 80% of which came from the property. The State commercial banks were responsible for the financial intermediation. Basically, the program relied on interest rate subsidies, which were necessary in the Brazilian macroeconomic context (Real Plan). Although the number of beneficiaries was significant, until 1998 the program favoured smallholders of southern Brazil, who had higher incomes and better market integration, because banks’ risk aversion still kept them from lending to the poorest. Demands and protests by several groups led to the program’s extension to populations with lower annual incomes, through larger interest rate subsidies. Despite the increasing number of contracts, the program has several drawbacks. Amongst them is its hugely increased cost, particularly through bank fees, including high administrative and bank spread costs, both paid by the government. Another is that for the poorest family farmers, the policy is finally the equivalent of a direct subsidy and has not succeeded in guaranteeing a long-term link with formal banks.
机译:巴西国家计划为支持家庭农场(原代)的计划于1994年实施,以促进农村贫困人口的缺乏,为这一人民提供信贷,没有以前获得正式银行信贷。该政策旨在减少巴西社会的不公平和贫困。由于农业传统上是基于大型土地的,这是一个巨大的创新。第一个受益者是小家庭农民,其活动主要是在家庭劳动力的基础上,最高年度收入为27 500个实际,其中至少80%来自该物业。国家商业银行负责金融中介。基本上,该计划依赖于利率补贴,这是巴西宏观经济背景(真正的计划)所必需的。虽然受益人的数量很大,直到1998年,该计划有利于巴西南部的小农,他收入较高,更好的市场一体化,因为银行的风险厌恶仍将他们留给最贫穷的贷款。几个团体的要求和抗议导致该计划的延伸,通过更大的利率补贴,每年收入的人口较低。尽管合同数量越来越多,但该计划有几个缺点。其中包括其巨大的成本,特别是通过银行费用,包括政府支付的高行政和银行差价。另一个是,对于最贫穷的家庭农民来说,政策终于相当于直接补贴,并没有成功地保证与正式银行的长期联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号