首页> 外文期刊>Cahiers Agricultures >Environmental impact and energy balance of three energy crops
【24h】

Environmental impact and energy balance of three energy crops

机译:三种能源作物对环境的影响和能量平衡

获取原文
           

摘要

Three energy crops were compared from the environmental point of view. The crops, possibly suitable for Belgium, included oilseed rape for biodiesel, sugar-beet for bioethanol, and short rotation coppice (SRC) for wood production. Studying the environmental impact of an energy production process is highly complex; we therefore concentrated on two main aspects: cultivation and global CO 2 emission. SRC is less intensive in terms of fertilisation and use of pesticides. This could increase biodiversity and decrease nitrogen leaching. However, the quantifies applied are not the only criterion to be used since different crops have different requirements. CO 2 emissions were calculated from the energy balance, comparing all energy outputs to all energy inputs associated with CO 2 exchange. All energy inputs in the entire chain leading up to the final product (source of energy) were taken into account. SRC, due to its better productivity and energy balance, again appeared very attractive. Nevertheless, since wood has less uses than alcohol or biodiesel and is less easy to utilise, the other energy crops should not be excluded.
机译:从环境角度比较了三种能源作物。可能适合比利时的作物包括用于生物柴油的油菜,用于生物乙醇的甜菜和用于木材生产的短轮小灌木林(SRC)。研究能源生产过程的环境影响非常复杂;因此,我们集中在两个主要方面:种植和全球CO 2排放。在施肥和使用农药方面,SRC的强度较低。这可以增加生物多样性并减少氮的淋失。但是,由于不同的农作物有不同的要求,因此所应用的数量并不是唯一的标准。从能量平衡中计算出CO 2排放量,将所有能量输出与与CO 2交换相关的所有能量输入进行比较。考虑了整个链中直至最终产品(能源)的所有能源输入。 SRC由于具有更高的生产率和能量平衡,因此再次显得非常有吸引力。但是,由于木材的用途比酒精或生物柴油少,而且不容易利用,因此不应排除其他能源作物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号