首页> 外文期刊>BioImpacts >Prophylactic Antibiotic Therapy in Contaminated Traumatic Wounds: Two Days versus Five Days Treatment
【24h】

Prophylactic Antibiotic Therapy in Contaminated Traumatic Wounds: Two Days versus Five Days Treatment

机译:污染性伤口的预防性抗生素治疗:2天比5天治疗

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Emergency department manages several kinds of wounds including simple, non-bite traumatic wounds and lacerations. Prophylactic antibiotic therapy is one of prescribed treatment in these conditions. We aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of the two day regimen of prophylactic antimicrobial agents with the five day regimen in simple traumatic but highly contaminated wounds. Methods Between January 2010 and May 2010, patients presenting with simple traumatic wounds or lacerations in different parts of the body, highly contaminated with soil, debris or feces in emergency department of a referral educational hospital in Tehran (Rasul-Akram hospital), Iran, went for primary closure. All of the patients were provided prophylactic antibiotic, however, prescribed for one group (A) of patients for 2 days and other group (B) received for 5 days, according to the physician concerned. As these treatments were routine, we selected 70 patients from each group using table of random numbers. The patients were warned about the signs of infection including long-lasting erythema, purulent discharge and inflammation and were supposed to inform the concerned physician in any of such alarming situations. Oral Cephalexin 500 mg qid was prescribed for all patients enrolled for prophylaxis treatment. Results On follow-up 11 (8.2%) patients were found to develop sutured site infection (6 out of 70 (8.57%) in group A, and five out of 70 (7.14%) in group B (P=0.31)). There was no statistical difference between infection rates between men (8.6%) in comparison to women (6.25%) (P&0.05; CI=95%). Conclusion Our study showed that 2-day prophylactic antibiotic therapy using Cephalexin is at least as effective as a 5-day regimen in relation to development of surgical site infection in patients with simple traumatic contaminated wounds or lacerations.
机译:简介急诊科处理多种伤口,包括简单,无咬伤的创伤和撕裂伤。在这些情况下,预防性抗生素治疗是处方治疗之一。我们旨在比较两天预防性抗菌药物治疗与五天治疗简单创伤但污染严重的伤口的临床疗效。方法2010年1月至2010年5月间,伊朗德黑兰转诊教育医院(拉苏尔-阿克拉姆医院)急诊科的患者在身体不同部位出现简单的创伤性伤口或撕裂伤,严重污染了土壤,碎片或粪便,去了主要的封闭。所有患者均接受了预防性抗生素治疗,但是,根据有关医生的说法,一组(A)患者需开2天药,另一组(B)患者应开5天药。由于这些治疗是常规治疗,我们使用随机表从每组中选择了70名患者。警告患者感染的迹象,包括持久的红斑,化脓性分泌物和炎症,并在任何此类令人震惊的情况下均应告知有关医生。对所有接受预防治疗的患者开出口服头孢克辛500 mg qid。结果随访发现11例(8.2%)患者发生了缝合部位感染(A组70例中有6例(8.57%),B组70例中有5例(7.14%)(P = 0.31))。与女性(6.25%)相比,男性(8.6%)之间的感染率之间没有统计学差异(P> 0.05; CI = 95%)。结论我们的研究表明,对于单纯创伤性伤口或撕裂伤患者,使用头孢氨苄的2天预防性抗生素治疗至少与5天治疗方案一样有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号