机译:模拟和监测的硫和氮到欧洲ICP-森林地点的沉积通量的比较
Concerning precipitation, the EMEP model and ICP network showedvery similar overall levels (within 4% for 1997 and 11% for 2000). Thecorrelation was, however, poor (r2=0.15–0.23). This canbe attributed largely to the influence of a few outliers,combined with a small range of rainfall amounts for most points.Correlations between modelled and observed deposition values in this studywere rather high (r2 values between 0.4–0.8 for most componentsand years), with mean values across all sites being within 30%.The EMEP model tends to give somewhat lower values for SO2−4,NO3− and NH4+ wet depositionto ICP, but differences in mean values were within 20% in 1997 and 30%in 2000. Modelled and observed concentrations of SO2−4,NO3− and NH4+ in precipitation are very similaron average (differences of 0–14%), with good correlation betweenmodelled and observed data (r2=0.50–0.78). Differences betweenthe EMEP model and ICP measurements are thought to arise from a mixtureof problems with both the observations and model. However, the overallconclusion is that the EMEP model performs rather well in reproducingpatterns of S and N deposition to European forests.
降水,EMEP模型和ICP网络显示出非常相似的总体水平(1997年为4%,2000年为11%)。然而,相关性很差(r 2 sup> = 0.15-0.23)。这在很大程度上可以归因于几个离群值的影响,以及大多数点的降雨量范围很小。在此研究中,模拟沉积值与观测值之间的相关性相当高(r 2 sup>值介于0.4-大多数组件和年份为0.8),所有站点的平均值均在30%以内.EMEP模型倾向于给出SO 2- sup> 4 sub>,NO 3 sub> − sup>和NH 4 sub> + sup>湿法沉积到ICP,但平均值的差异在1997年和20%之内2000年的SO 2 − sup> 4 sub>,NO 3 sub> - sup>和NH 4浓度的模型和观测值降水中的 sub> + sup>非常相似(差异为0%至14%),模型数据和观测数据之间具有很好的相关性(r 2 sup> = 0.50-0.78)。 EMEP模型和ICP测量值之间的差异被认为是由观测值和模型问题混合引起的。然而,总体结论是,EMEP模型在将硫和氮沉积模式复制到欧洲森林中表现良好。
机译:欧洲综合监测站中氮和硫化合物的流量和趋势
机译:低成本测量半高山站点上氮和硫的干沉积速度:梯度测量以及与沉积模型估算值的比较
机译:在EURODELTAIII项目框架内,通过六个化学迁移模型预测的沉积通量和无机氮,硫化合物的大气浓度的联合分析
机译:欧洲综合监测站氮和硫化合物的通量和趋势
机译:动态分析评估了阿萨巴斯卡油砂地区土壤和地表水对硫和氮沉积变化的化学响应。
机译:通过14种空气质量模型系统对欧洲的氮和硫沉积模型进行了估算:评估排放变化的影响以及对栖息地保护的影响
机译:模拟和监测的硫和氮到欧洲ICP-森林地点的沉积通量的比较