【24h】

Tensile Bond Strength of Four Adhesive Systems

机译:四种胶粘剂体系的拉伸粘结强度

获取原文
           

摘要

The continuous appearance of new restorative materials, especially from the composite resins class, and the development of the correspondent adhesive systems has brought major changes about the way in which cavities are being prepared. Thus, a big part of the restorative therapy in modern dentistry is based on the composite resins adhesion to the hard dental tissues, achieved through adhesive systems. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the adhesion strength to the dentin of four commercial adhesive systems. Experimental: Twenty primary, caries-free and without previous restorations, molars and premolars were used in the study. For testing we used three total-etch adhesives and a self-etch one. In order to obtain standard samples, a Teflon mould was designed and manufactured, which helped us to apply the same resin volume on the same dentin surface for all the teeth used in this test. Results: Statistical analysis was completed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey and Bonferroni tests. Significantly differences were observed between Point4/Optibond SoloPlus and the rest of the samples, the former achieving higher values. Conclusions: The self-etch adhesive system did not match the performances of the total-etch adhesives, at least not in this study.
机译:新的修复材料的不断出现,特别是复合树脂类的修复材料的发展,以及相应粘合剂系统的发展,使得制备型腔的方式发生了重大变化。因此,现代牙科修复疗法的很大一部分是基于通过粘合系统实现的复合树脂对坚硬牙齿组织的粘合。本研究的目的是评估四种商业粘合剂体系对牙本质的粘合强度。实验性:研究中使用了二十个原发性,无龋齿且无先前修复体的磨牙和前磨牙。为了进行测试,我们使用了三种全蚀刻粘合剂和一种自蚀刻粘合剂。为了获得标准样品,设计并制造了一种Teflon模具,该模具帮助我们在该测试中使用的所有牙齿的相同牙本质表面上施加了相同的树脂量。结果:使用单向方差分析,Tukey和Bonferroni检验完成了统计分析。 Point4 / Optibond SoloPlus与其余样品之间观察到显着差异,前者获得更高的值。结论:至少在本研究中,自蚀刻胶粘剂系统与全蚀刻胶粘剂的性能不匹配。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号