...
首页> 外文期刊>Biogeosciences >Comparison of soil greenhouse gas fluxes from extensive and intensive grazing in a temperate maritime climate
【24h】

Comparison of soil greenhouse gas fluxes from extensive and intensive grazing in a temperate maritime climate

机译:温带海洋气候下广泛放牧和集约放牧的土壤温室气体通量的比较

获取原文

摘要

Greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes from a seminatural, extensively sheep-grazeddrained moorland and intensively sheep-grazed fertilised grassland inSouth East (SE) Scotland were compared over 4 yr (2007–2010). Nitrousoxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) fluxes were measured by staticchambers, respiration from soil plus ground vegetation by a flow-throughchamber, and the net ecosystem exchange (NEE) of carbon dioxide (CO2)by eddy-covariance. All GHG fluxes displayed high temporal and interannualvariability. Temperature, radiation, water table height and precipitationcould explain a significant percentage of seasonal and interannualvariations. Greenhouse gas fluxes were dominated by the net ecosystemexchange of CO2 at both sites. Net ecosystem exchange of CO2 andrespiration was much larger on the productive fertilised grassland (?1567and 7157 g CO2eq m?2 yr?1, respectively) than on the seminaturalmoorland (?267 and 2554 g CO2eq m?2 yr?1, respectively). Largeruminant CH4 (147 g CO2eq m?2 yr?1) and soil N2O(384 g CO2eq m?2 yr−1) losses from the grazed grasslandcounteracted the CO2 uptake by 34%, whereas the small N2O (0.8 g CO2eq m?2 yr−1) and CH4(7 g CO2eq m?2 yr?1) emissions from the moorland only impacted the NEE flux by3%. The 4-yr average GHG budget for the grazed grassland was ?1034 g CO2eq m?2 yr?1 and ?260 g CO2eq m?2 yr?1 forthe moorland.
机译:在过去的4年中(2007年至2010年),对来自苏格兰东南(SE)的一个半自然的,广泛放牧的草地和密集放牧绵羊的肥沃草地的温室气体(GHG)通量进行了比较。通过静态腔室,通流腔室从土壤和地面植被的呼吸作用以及净生态系统交换量(N 2 O)和甲烷(CH 4 )的通量来测量涡-协方差表示二氧化碳(CO 2 )的NEE。所有温室气体通量均显示出较高的时间和年际变化。温度,辐射,地下水位高度和降水可以解释很大比例的季节和年际变化。在两个地点,CO 2 的净生态系统交换主导着温室气体通量。施肥草地上的CO 2 净生态系统交换和呼吸作用要大得多(?1567和7157 g CO 2 eq m ?2 yr ?1 分别比半自然沼泽地(?267和2554 g CO 2 eq m ?2 yr ?1 )。大反刍动物CH 4 (147 g CO 2 eq m ?2 yr ?1 )和土壤N 2 O(384 g CO 2 eq m ?2 yr -1 < / sup>)导致的放牧草地损失CO 2 减少了34%,而N 2 O小(0.8 g CO 2 < sub> eq m ?2 yr -1 )和CH 4 (7 g CO 2 沼地的 eq m ?2 yr ?1 )排放仅对NEE通量产生了3%的影响。放牧草地的4年平均温室气体预算为1034 g CO 2 eq m ?2 yr ?1 和?260 g CO 2 eq m ?2 yr ?1

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号