...
首页> 外文期刊>Biogeosciences >Water level, vegetation composition, and plant productivity explain greenhouse gas fluxes in temperate cutover fens after inundation
【24h】

Water level, vegetation composition, and plant productivity explain greenhouse gas fluxes in temperate cutover fens after inundation

机译:水位,植被组成和植物生产力解释了淹没后温带割草中的温室气体通量

获取原文
           

摘要

Peat extraction leaves a land surface with a strong relief of deep cutover areas and higher ridges. Rewetting inundates the deep parts, while less deeply extracted zones remain at or above the water level. In temperate fens the flooded areas are colonized by helophytes such as iEriophorum angustifolium/i, iCarex/i spp., iTypha latifolia/i or iPhragmites australis/i dependent on water depth. Reeds of iTypha/i and iPhragmites/i are reported as large sources of methane, but data on net COsub2/sub uptake are contradictory for iTypha/i and rare for iPhragmites/i. Here, we analyze the effect of vegetation, water level and nutrient conditions on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for representative vegetation types along water level gradients at two rewetted cutover fens (mesotrophic and eutrophic) in Belarus. Greenhouse gas emissions were measured campaign-wise with manual chambers every 2 to 4 weeks for 2 years and interpolated by modelling. brbr All sites had negligible nitrous oxide exchange rates. Most sites were carbon sinks and small GHG sources. Methane emissions generally increased with net ecosystem COsub2/sub uptake. Mesotrophic small sedge reeds with water table around the land surface were small GHG sources in the range of 2.3 to 4.2?t?COsub2/sub?eq.?hasup?1/sup?yrsup?1/sup. Eutrophic tall sedge – iTypha latifolia/i reeds on newly formed floating mats were substantial net GHG emitters in the range of 25.1 to 39.1?t?COsub2/sub?eq.?hasup?1/sup?yr. They represent transient vegetation stages. iPhragmites/i reeds ranged between ?1.7 to 4.2?t?COsub2/sub?eq.?hasup?1/sup?yrsup?1/sup with an overall mean GHG emission of 1.3?t?COsub2/sub?eq.?hasup?1/sup?yrsup?1/sup. The annual COsub2/sub balance was best explained by vegetation biomass, which includes the role of vegetation composition and species. Methane emissions were obviously driven by biological activity of vegetation and soil organisms. brbr Shallow flooding of cutover temperate fens is a suitable measure to arrive at low GHG emissions. iPhragmites australis/i establishment should be promoted in deeper flooded areas and will lead to moderate, but variable GHG emissions or even occasional sinks. The risk of large GHG emissions is higher for eutrophic than mesotrophic peatlands. Nevertheless, flooding of eutrophic temperate fens still represents a safe GHG mitigation option because even the hotspot of our study, the floating tall sedge – iTypha latifolia/i reeds, did not exceed the typical range of GHG emissions from drained fen grasslands and the spatially dominant iPhragmites australis/i reed emitted by far less GHG than drained fens.
机译:泥炭提取使陆地表面的深部割接区和较高的山脊有很强的起伏。再润湿淹没了较深的部分,而较不深的提取区域则保持在水位或高于水位。在温带地区,洪水泛滥地区被诸如 Eriophorum angustifolium , Carex spp。, Typha latifolia 或 Phragmites australis 的原生植物定殖。 i>取决于水深。据报道,香蒲和芦苇的芦苇是甲烷的主要来源,但香蒲的净CO 2 摄入量数据却是矛盾的。 i>和 Phragmites 很少见。在这里,我们分析了白俄罗斯两个重新划定的割草区(中营养和富营养化)沿水位梯度的代表性植被类型的植被,水位和养分状况对温室气体(GHG)排放的影响。温室气体排放量是每2到4周使用手动隔室进行运动测量,持续2年,并通过建模进行插值。 所有站点的一氧化二氮汇率都可以忽略不计。大多数场所是碳汇和小型温室气体源。甲烷排放通常随着生态系统净CO 2 的吸收而增加。在地表周围有地下水位的中营养小莎草芦苇是小型温室气体源,范围在2.3至4.2?t?CO 2 ?eq。?ha ?1 ?yr ?1 。富营养化的高莎草–新形成的浮垫上的香蒲是大量的温室气体净排放者,范围在25.1至39.1?t?CO 2 ?eq。?ha ?1 ?yr。它们代表了短暂的植被阶段。 芦苇的芦苇范围介于?1.7至4.2?t?CO 2 ?eq。?ha ?1 ?yr ?1 ,温室气体总平均排放量为1.3?t?CO 2 ?eq。?ha ?1 ?yr ?1 。每年CO 2 的平衡最好用植被生物量来解释,其中包括植被组成和物种的作用。甲烷排放显然是由植被和土壤生物的生物活性驱动的。 浅埋温带分水岭是减少温室气体排放的合适措施。应该在更深的水灾地区推广芦苇的建立,这将导致适度但可变的温室气体排放,甚至偶有汇。富营养化泥炭地的温室气体排放风险较高。尽管如此,富营养化的温带芬分s仍然可以作为一种安全的温室气体减排手段,因为即使是我们研究的热点,飘浮的高莎草( lathafolia 芦苇)也没有超出沥干芬分的典型温室气体排放范围。草原和空间上占主导地位的芦苇芦苇所排放的温室气体远少于沥干的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号