...
首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of the Medical Library Association. >Population groups: indexing, coverage, and retrieval effectiveness of ethnically related health care issues in health sciences databases.
【24h】

Population groups: indexing, coverage, and retrieval effectiveness of ethnically related health care issues in health sciences databases.

机译:人群:健康科学数据库中与种族相关的医疗保健问题的索引编制,覆盖范围和检索效力。

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This study examined methods of accessing (for indexing and retrieval purposes) medical research on population groups in the major abstracting and indexing services of the health sciences literature. DESIGN: The study of diseases in specific population groups is facilitated by the indexing of both diseases and populations in a database. The MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Embase databases were selected for the study. The published thesauri for these databases were examined to establish the vocabulary in use. Indexing terms were identified and examined as to their representation in the current literature. Terms were clustered further into groups thought to reflect an end user's perspective and to facilitate subsequent analysis. The medical literature contained in the three online databases was searched with both controlled vocabulary and natural language terms. RESULTS: The three thesauri revealed shallow pre-coordinated hierarchical structures, rather difficult-to-use terms for post-coordination, and a blurring of cultural, genetic, and racial facets of populations. Post-coordination is difficult because of the system-oriented terminology, which is intended mostly for information professionals. The terminology unintentionally restricts access by the end users who lack the knowledge needed to use the thesauri effectively for information retrieval. CONCLUSIONS: Population groups are not represented adequately in the index languages of health sciences databases. Users of these databases need to be alerted to the difficulties that may be encountered in searching for information on population groups. Information and health professionals may not be able to access the literature if they are not familiar with the indexing policies on population groups. Consequently, the study points to a problem that needs to be addressed, through either the redesign of existing systems or the design of new ones to meet the goals of Healthy People 2000 and beyond.
机译:目的:本研究探讨了在卫生科学文献的主要摘要和索引服务中访问(出于索引和检索目的)人群医学研究的方法。设计:通过在数据库中同时对疾病和人群编制索引,可以促进特定人群中疾病的研究。选择MEDLINE,PsycINFO和Embase数据库进行研究。检查了这些数据库的已发布词库,以建立所使用的词汇表。确定索引词并检查其在当前文献中的表示形式。术语被进一步分为几组,以反映最终用户的观点并促进后续分析。使用受控词汇和自然语言术语搜索了三个在线数据库中包含的医学文献。结果:这三个叙词表揭示了较浅的预先协调的等级结构,后期协调使用不易使用的术语,以及人口的文化,遗传和种族方面的模糊。由于面向系统的术语(主要用于信息专业人员),后期协调很困难。术语无意地限制了缺乏有效使用叙词表来进行信息检索所需知识的最终用户的访问。结论:在卫生科学数据库的索引语言中,人群没有得到足够的代表。这些数据库的用户需要警惕在搜索有关人群的信息时可能遇到的困难。如果信息和卫生专业人员不熟悉有关人群的索引编制政策,则可能无法获取文献。因此,该研究指出需要通过重新设计现有系统或设计新系统来满足“ 2000年健康人”及以后目标的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号