...
首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Dental Journal >Effect of Surface Pretreatments on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic Repaired with Composite Resin
【24h】

Effect of Surface Pretreatments on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Lithium-Disilicate Ceramic Repaired with Composite Resin

机译:表面预处理对复合树脂修复的二硅酸锂陶瓷微拉伸强度的影响

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of ceramic surface treatments and silane drying temperature on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of a resin composite to a lithium disilicate ceramic. Twenty blocks (7x7x5 mm) of lithium disilicate-based hotpressed ceramic were fabricated and randomly divided into 4 groups: G1: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with room-temperature air; G2: acid etching with 9.5% hydrofluoric acid for 20 s and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G3: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 µm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with 45 ± 5 °C warm air; G4: airborne-particle abrasion with 50 µm aluminum oxide particles and drying silane with air at room-temperature. After treatments, an adhesive system (Single Bond 2) was applied, light-cured and direct restorations were built up with a resin composite (Filtek Z250). Each specimen was stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and cut into ceramic-composite beams with 1 mm2 of cross-sectional area for µTBS testing. Statistical analysis was performed with one-way ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls test (α=0.05). µTBS means (S.D.) in MPa were: G1: 32.14 (7.98), G2: 35.00 (7.77) and G3: 18.36 (6.17). All specimens of G4 failed during the cutting. G1 and G2 presented significantly higher µTBS than G3 (p0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between G1 and G2 (p0.05). As far as the bond strength is concerned, surface pretreatment of lithium-disilicate ceramic with hydrofluoric acid and silane application can be used as an alternative to repair ceramic restorations with composite resin, while surface pretreatment with sandblasting should be avoided.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估陶瓷表面处理和硅烷干燥温度对树脂复合材料与二硅酸锂陶瓷的微拉伸粘合强度(µTBS)的影响。制造了二十块(7x7x5 mm)二硅酸锂基热压陶瓷,并将其随机分为4组:G1:用9.5%氢氟酸酸腐蚀20 s,并在室温空气中干燥硅烷; G2:用9.5%氢氟酸酸蚀20s,并在45±5℃的热空气中干燥硅烷; G3:用50 µm氧化铝颗粒在空气中进行颗粒磨损,并在45±5°C的暖空气中干燥硅烷; G4:用50 µm氧化铝颗粒在空气中进行颗粒磨损,并在室温下用空气干燥硅烷。处理后,应用粘合剂体系(单键2),光固化并用树脂复合材料(Filtek Z250)构建直接修复体。将每个样品在37°C的蒸馏水中保存24小时,并切成横截面积为1 mm2的陶瓷复合梁,用于µTBS测试。用单向方差分析和Student-Newman-Keuls检验进行统计分析(α= 0.05)。以MPa为单位的µTBS平均值(S.D.)为:G1:32.14(7.98),G2:35.00(7.77)和G3:18.36(6.17)。 G4的所有标本在切割过程中均失败。 G1和G2的µTBS显着高于G3(p <0.05)。 G1和G2之间无统计学差异(p> 0.05)。就粘结强度而言,可以使用氢氟酸和硅烷涂覆对二硅酸锂陶瓷表面进行预处理,以替代用复合树脂修复陶瓷修复体的方法,同时应避免使用喷砂处理进行表面预处理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号