...
首页> 外文期刊>Brain and Behavior >Using Delphi methodology in the development of a new patient‐reported outcome measure for stroke survivors with visual impairment
【24h】

Using Delphi methodology in the development of a new patient‐reported outcome measure for stroke survivors with visual impairment

机译:在患有视力障碍的中风幸存者的新的患者报告结局指标的开发中使用Delphi方法

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction The aim of this study was to ascertain what items stroke survivors and stroke care professionals think are important when assessing quality of life for stroke survivors with visual impairment for inclusion in the new patient‐reported outcome measure. Methods A reactive Delphi process was used in a three‐round electronic‐based survey. The items presented consisted of 62 items originally sourced from a systematic review of existing vision‐related quality of life instruments and stroke survivor interviews, reduced and refined following a ranking exercise and pilot with stroke survivors with visual impairment. Stakeholders (stroke survivors/clinicians) were invited to take part in the process. A consensus definition of ≥70% was decided a priori. Participants were asked to rank importance on a 9‐point scale and categorize the items by relevance to types of visual impairment following stroke or not relevant. Analysis of consensus, stability, and agreement was conducted. Results In total, 113 participants registered for the Delphi survey of which 47 (41.6%) completed all three rounds. Response rates to the three rounds were 78/113 (69.0%), 61/76 (81.3%), and 49/64 (76.6%), respectively. The participants included orthoptists (45.4%), occupational therapists (44.3%), and stroke survivors (10.3%). Consensus was reached on 56.5% of items in the three‐round process, all for inclusion. A consensus was reached for 83.8% in the categorization of items. The majority (82.6%) of consensus were for relevant to ‘all visual impairment following stroke’; two items were deemed ‘not relevant’. Conclusion The lack of item reduction achieved by this Delphi process highlights the need for additional methods of item reduction in the development of a new PROM for visual impairment following stroke. These results will be considered alongside Rasch analysis to achieve further item reduction. However, the Delphi survey remains important as it provides clinical and patient insight into each item rather than purely relying on the psychometric data.
机译:引言这项研究的目的是确定中风幸存者和中风护理专业人员在评估视力障碍中风幸存者的生活质量以纳入新的患者报告的结局指标时,认为哪些项目很重要。方法采用反应性Delphi过程进行了三轮基于电子的调查。提出的项目包括62个项目,这些项目最初来自对与视觉相关的现有生活质量工具和中风幸存者访谈的系统评价,在进行分级练习后和患有视觉障碍的中风幸存者飞行员进行了缩小和细化。利益相关者(中风幸存者/临床医生)被邀请参加该过程。先验确定≥70%的共识定义。要求参与者按照9分制对重要性进行排名,并根据中风后视力障碍的相关性或不相关性对项目进行分类。对共识,稳定性和协议进行了分析。结果总共有113名参与者注册了Delphi调查,其中47名(41.6%)完成了所有三个回合。对这三轮的回应率分别为78/113(69.0%),61/76(81.3%)和49/64(76.6%)。参与者包括矫形器(45.4%),职业治疗师(44.3%)和中风幸存者(10.3%)。在三轮流程中,对56.5%的项目达成了共识,所有项目都包括在内。项目分类达成了83.8%的共识。大多数共识(82.6%)与“中风后所有视觉障碍”有关;有两项被认为是“不相关”。结论该Delphi流程缺乏物品减少功能,突显了在开发针对卒中后视力障碍的新PROM时需要其他物品减少方法。这些结果将与Rasch分析一起考虑,以实现进一步的项目减少。但是,Delphi调查仍然很重要,因为它为临床和患者提供了对每个项目的洞察力,而不是仅仅依靠心理数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号