首页> 外文期刊>Bulletin of Emergency and Trauma >Local Anesthetic Effect of Amitriptyline versus Lidocaine in Isolated Lesion of the Limb Requiring Primary Suturing; Assessing a Novel Therapeutic Agent
【24h】

Local Anesthetic Effect of Amitriptyline versus Lidocaine in Isolated Lesion of the Limb Requiring Primary Suturing; Assessing a Novel Therapeutic Agent

机译:阿米替林与利多卡因在需要初次缝合的肢体孤立病变中的局部麻醉作用;评估新型治疗剂

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To compare the anesthetic effects of topical amitriptyline 2% with lidocaine 2% in isolated limb wound repair with suturing.Methods: In a randomized clinical trial, 90 patients with a complaint of isolated ulcer and require a preliminary repair by suturing were selected from patients referred to emergency department of Beast Hospital in Hamadan. ??First, the scars were washed and anesthetized with lidocaine 2%. If after the peak period effect of lidocaine, the pain score of patients did not decrease, they randomly assigned to two groups, Lidocaine or Amitriptyline gel. After the intervention and during the suturing, the patient's pain score was measured at the intervals specified time by the visual analogous scale (VAS) and results recorded on the checklist. Finally, the collected data were analyzed by SPSS software version 20 at 95% confidence levelResults: In the lidocaine and amitriptyline group, the mean age of the patients was 29.08 and 27.34 years, and male gender frequency was 71.1% and 80% respectively. Both groups were matched for age and sex. Mean score of pain in both groups decreased from the score of 10 before the intervention to 7.33 in the lidocaine group and 0.53 in amitriptyline group. Based on the results of the ANOVA repeated measure test, there was a statistically significant difference between the mean score of pain in the two groups (p0.001).Conclusion: In patients with isolated limbs ulcers, requiring initial repair with suturing, numbness and analgesia effect of amitriptyline 2% gel, with dose 2 mg/kg is better than lidocaine 2%. ??Clinical Trial Registry: IRCT20120215009014N216
机译:目的:比较局部阿米替林2%与利多卡因2%在孤立的肢体伤口缝合修复中的麻醉效果。方法:在一项随机临床试验中,从90例主诉孤立溃疡的患者中选择需要缝合的初步修复方法。这些患者被转诊至哈马丹市野兽医院急诊科。首先,将疤痕洗净并用2%的利多卡因麻醉。如果在利多卡因的高峰期作用后,患者的疼痛评分没有降低,则将他们随机分为两组,利多卡因或阿米替林凝胶。干预后和缝合过程中,在指定的时间间隔通过视觉类似量表(VAS)测量患者的疼痛评分,并将结果记录在检查表中。最后,使用SPSS软件20版以95%的置信水平对收集的数据进行分析。结果:利多卡因和阿米替林组的患者平均年龄为29.08岁和27.34岁,男性频率分别为71.1%和80%。两组均按年龄和性别配对。两组的平均疼痛评分均从干预前的10分降至利多卡因组的7.33分和阿米替林组的0.53分。根据ANOVA重复测量测试的结果,两组的平均疼痛评分之间存在统计学上的显着差异(p <0.001)。结论:患有孤立性四肢溃疡的患者需要进行初步修复,需要缝合,麻木和阿米替林2%凝胶的镇痛效果为2 mg / kg,优于利多卡因2%。临床试验注册中心:IRCT20120215009014N216

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号