...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Short term risk of non-fatal and fatal suicidal behaviours: the predictive validity of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale in a Swedish adult psychiatric population with a recent episode of self-harm
【24h】

Short term risk of non-fatal and fatal suicidal behaviours: the predictive validity of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale in a Swedish adult psychiatric population with a recent episode of self-harm

机译:非致命和致命的自杀行为的短期风险:哥伦比亚自杀严重性等级量表在最近患有自残事件的瑞典成年精神病患者中的预测有效性

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is a relatively new instrument for the assessment of suicidal ideation and behaviour that is widely used in clinical and research settings. The predictive properties of the C-SSRS have mainly been evaluated in young US populations. We wanted to examine the instrument’s predictive validity in a Swedish cohort of adults seeking psychiatric emergency services after an episode of self-harm. Prospective cohort study of patients (n?=?804) presenting for psychiatric emergency assessment after an episode of self-harm with or without suicidal intent. Suicidal ideation and behaviours at baseline were rated with the C-SSRS and subsequent non-fatal and fatal suicide attempts within 6?months were identified by record review. Logistic regression was used to evaluate separate ideation items and total scores as predictors of non-fatal and fatal suicide attempts. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were constructed for the suicidal ideation (SI) intensity score and the C-SSRS total score. In this cohort, the median age at baseline was 33?years, 67% were women and 68% had made at least one suicide attempt prior to the index attempt. At least one non-fatal or fatal suicide attempt was recorded during follow-up for 165 persons (20.5%). The single C-SSRS items frequency, duration and deterrents were associated with this composite outcome; controllability and reasons were not. In a logistic regression model adjusted for previous history of suicide attempt, SI intensity score was a significant predictor of a non-fatal or fatal suicide attempt (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.03–1.12). ROC analysis showed that the SI intensity score was somewhat better than chance in correctly classifying the outcome (AUC 0.62, 95% CI 0.57–0.66). The corresponding figures for the C-SSRS total score were 0.65, 95% CI 0.60–0.69. The C-SSRS items frequency, duration and deterrents were associated with elevated short term risk in this adult psychiatric cohort, as were both the SI intensity score and the C-SSRS total score. However, the ability to correctly predict future suicidal behaviour was limited for both scores.
机译:哥伦比亚-自杀严重等级量表(C-SSRS)是一种用于评估自杀意念和行为的相对较新的工具,已广泛用于临床和研究环境。 C-SSRS的预测特性主要在美国年轻人中进行了评估。我们想在自残发作后寻求精神科急诊服务的瑞典成年人中检查该仪器的预测有效性。在有或无自杀意向的自残事件发生后进行精神病紧急评估的患者(n == 804)的前瞻性队列研究。使用C-SSRS对基线时的自杀意念和行为进行了评估,并通过记录审查确定了在6个月内随后发生的非致命性和致命性自杀企图。 Logistic回归用于评估单独的构思项目和总分,作为非致命和致命自杀企图的预测指标。绘制了自杀意念(SI)强度评分和C-SSRS总评分的接收者工作特征(ROC)曲线。在该队列中,基线的中位年龄为33岁,女性为67%,68%在尝试进行索引之前至少进行过一次自杀尝试。随访期间至少有1次非致命或致命的自杀未遂事件,记录了165人(20.5%)。单个C-SSRS项目的频率,持续时间和威慑力与该综合结果相关。可控性和原因没有。在针对先前自杀未遂史进行调整的逻辑回归模型中,SI强度评分是非致命或致命自杀未遂的重要预测指标(OR 1.08; 95%CI 1.03-1.12)。 ROC分析表明,SI强度评分比正确分类结局的机会好于几率(AUC 0.62,95%CI 0.57-0.66)。 C-SSRS总分的对应数字是0.65,95%CI 0.60–0.69。 C-SSRS项目的频率,持续时间和威慑作用与该成人精神病学队列的短期风险升高相关,SI强度评分和C-SSRS总评分也是如此。但是,两个评分均无法正确预测未来的自杀行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号