...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Transfer of manualized Short Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) for social anxiety disorder into clinical practice: results from a cluster-randomised controlled trial
【24h】

Transfer of manualized Short Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) for social anxiety disorder into clinical practice: results from a cluster-randomised controlled trial

机译:将社交焦虑症的手动短期心理动力心理治疗(STPP)转移至临床实践:一项整群随机对照试验的结果

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Despite growing evidence for manualized psychodynamic treatments, there is a lack of studies on their transfer to routine practice. This is the first study to examine the effects of an additional training in manualized Short Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy (STPP) on the outcome in routine psychotherapy for social anxiety disorder (SAD). The study is an extension to a large RCT comparing STPP to Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy of SAD. Methods The manualized treatment was designed for a time limited approach with 25 individual sessions of STPP over 6?months. Private practitioners were randomized to training in manualized STPP (mSTPP) vs. treatment as usual without a specific training (tauSTPP). A total of 109 patients were enrolled (105 started treatment; 75 completed at least 20 treatment sessions). Assessments were conducted pre-treatment, after 8 and 15?weeks, after 25 treatment sessions, at the end of treatment, 6 and 12?months after termination of treatment. Remission as primary outcome was defined by the Liebowitz-Social-Anxiety-Scale (LSAS) score ≤30. Secondary outcomes were response (at least 31% reduction in LSAS), treatment duration and number of sessions, changes in social anxiety (LSAS, SPAI), depression (BDI), clinical global impression (CGI), and quality of life (EQ-5D). Results Remission rates of mSTPP (9%) resp. tauSTPP (16%) and also response rates of 33% resp. 28% were comparable between the two treatment approaches as well as treatment duration and number of sessions. Most of the within-group differences (baseline to 25 sessions) indicated moderate to large improvements in both treatments; within-group differences from baseline to 12?months follow-up (LSAS, SPAI, BDI, CGI) were large ranging from d?=??0.605 to d?=??2.937. Benefits of mSTPP were limited to single outcomes. Conclusions Findings are discussed with regard to implementation and dissemination of empirically validated treatments in psychodynamic training and practice. SAD patients with a high comorbidity of personality disorders and a long treatment history may need longer treatments. Trial registration German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) DRKS00000570 , registered 03. March 2011.
机译:背景技术尽管有越来越多的证据表明采用手动心理动力疗法,但仍缺乏将其转移至常规实践的研究。这是第一项研究对手动短期心理动力心理治疗(STPP)进行额外培训对社交焦虑症(SAD)常规心理治疗结果的影响的研究。这项研究是将STPP与SAD认知行为疗法进行比较的大型RCT的扩展。方法手动治疗是针对时间限制的方法设计的,在6个月内进行25次STPP治疗。私人执业医师随机接受手动STPP(mSTPP)培训,而无特殊培训(tauSTPP)照常接受治疗。共有109位患者入组(105位开始治疗; 75位至少完成20个疗程)。在治疗前,治疗8周和15周后,治疗25次之后,治疗结束时,治疗终止后6和12个月进行评估。缓解作为主要结局定义为利勃维茨-社交焦虑量表(LSAS)得分≤30。次要结果是反应(LSAS降低至少31%),治疗时间和疗程数,社交焦虑症的改变(LSAS,SPAI),抑郁症(BDI),临床总体印象(CGI)和生活质量(EQ- 5D)。结果mSTPP的缓解率(9%)。 tauSTPP(16%),回应率分别为33%。两种治疗方法以及治疗时间和疗程数之间的可比性为28%。组内大多数差异(基线至25个疗程)表明两种治疗均有中度至大的改善;从基线到随访12个月(LSAS,SPAI,BDI,CGI)的组内差异较大,范围从d?=?0.605到d?=?2.937。 mSTPP的益处仅限于单一结果。结论讨论了有关在心理动力训练和实践中实施和传播经过经验验证的治疗方法的发现。人格障碍合并症高且治疗时间长的SAD患者可能需要更长的治疗时间。试验注册德国临床试验注册(DRKS)DRKS00000570,注册日期:2011年3月3日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号