首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >Is schizophrenia disappearing? The rise and fall of the diagnosis of functional psychoses: an essay
【24h】

Is schizophrenia disappearing? The rise and fall of the diagnosis of functional psychoses: an essay

机译:精神分裂症消失了吗?功能性精神病诊断的兴衰:一篇论文

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The categories of functional psychoses build on views of influential professionals. There have long been four main categories – affective, schizophrenic, schizoaffective/cycloid/reactive/polymorphic, and delusional/paranoid psychoses. The last three are included in “psychotic disorders”. However, this dichotomy and the distinctions between categories may have been over-estimated and contributed to lack of progress. Ten topics relevant for the diagnosis of functional psychoses 1. The categories of functional psychoses have varied with time, place and professionals’ views, with moving boundaries, especially between schizophrenia and affective psychoses. 2. Catatonia is most often related to affective and organic psychoses, and paranoia is related to grandiosity and guilt, calling in question catatonic and paranoid schizophrenia. Arguments exist for schizophrenia being a “misdiagnosis”. 3. In some countries schizophrenia has been renamed, with positive consequences. 4. The doctrine of “unitary psychosis”, which included abnormal affect, was left in the second half of the 1800s. 5. This was followed by a dichotomy between schizophrenia and affective psychoses and broadening of the schizophrenia concept, whereas affective symptoms were strongly downgraded. 6. Many homogeneous psychoses with mixtures of schizophrenic and affective symptoms were described and related to “psychotic disorders”, although they might as well be affective disorders. 7. Critique of the extensive schizophrenia concept led to, in DSM-III and ICD-10, affective symptoms being exclusion criteria for schizophrenia and acceptance of mood-incongruent psychotic symptoms in affective psychoses. 8. However, affective symptoms are often difficult to acknowledge, diagnosis is often done on the basis of tradition and previous education, and patients’ affect characterized accordingly. 9. DSM-5 is up-dated with separate chapters for catatonia and psychotic symptoms, and removal of the subtypes of schizophrenia. However, time may be running out for categorical psychosis diagnoses, which may be replaced by continuum, spectrum, dimensional and research domain criteria, in line with new biological data 10. This is supported by treatment responses across categories. Conclusion The time-consuming works on diagnosis of psychoses may have hampered progress. Chronic mood disorders may appear as schizophrenic or paranoid psychosis, end-stages like heart failure in heart diseases. This underscores the importance of early and optimal treatment of mood disorders.
机译:背景功能性精神病的类别基于有影响力的专业人员的观点。长期以来,主要有四个类别-情感,精神分裂症,情感分裂/摆线/反应性/多态性和妄想/偏执型精神病。后三个包括在“精神疾病”中。但是,这种二分法和类别之间的区别可能被高估了,导致缺乏进展。与功能性精神病诊断有关的十个主题1.功能性精神病的类别随时间,地点和专业人员的看法而变化,界限不断变化,尤其是精神分裂症和情感性精神病之间。 2.卡塔顿尼亚最常与情感性和器质性精神病有关,而妄想症则与雄心壮志和内感有关,这被认为是猫顿性和偏执型精神分裂症。精神分裂症是一种“误诊”的说法。 3.在某些国家,精神分裂症已更名,产生了积极的后果。 4.包括异常影响在内的“单一精神病”学说在1800年代下半叶被遗弃。 5.其次是精神分裂症和情感性精神病之间的二分法和精神分裂症概念的扩大,而情感症状被大大降低。 6.尽管精神分裂症和情感症状混合在一起可能是情感障碍,但也描述了许多同质性精神病,包括精神分裂症和情感症状。 7.对广泛的精神分裂症概念的批评导致在DSM-III和ICD-10中,情感症状成为精神分裂症的排除标准,并且在情感性精神病中接受了与情绪无关的精神病性症状。 8.但是,情感症状通常难以识别,诊断通常基于传统和先前的教育,并且患者的情感也具有相应的特征。 9. DSM-5更新了有关卡塔尼亚和精神病症状的章节,并删除了精神分裂症的亚型。但是,分类精神病诊断的时间可能会用完,根据新的生物学数据10,连续性,频谱,维度和研究领域的标准可能会取代它。这由不同类别的治疗反应所支持。结论耗时的精神病诊断工作可能阻碍了进展。慢性情绪障碍可能表现为精神分裂症或偏执性精神病,例如心脏病的心力衰竭等终末期。这强调了早期和最佳治疗情绪障碍的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号