首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >The negative affect repair questionnaire: factor analysis and psychometric evaluation in three samples
【24h】

The negative affect repair questionnaire: factor analysis and psychometric evaluation in three samples

机译:负面影响修复问卷:三个样本中的因素分析和心理测评

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Negative affect and difficulties in its regulation have been connected to several adverse psychological consequences. While several questionnaires exist, it would be important to have a theory-based measure that includes clinically relevant items and shows good psychometric properties in healthy and patient samples. This study aims at developing such a questionnaire, combining the two Gross [1] scales Reappraisal and Suppression with an additional response-focused scale called Externalizing Behavioral Strategies covering clinically relevant items. Methods The samples consisted of 684 students (mean age?=?23.3, SD?=?3.5; 53.6% female) and 369 persons with mixed mental disorders (mean age?=?36.0 SD?=?14.6; 71.2% female). Items for the questionnaire were derived from existing questionnaires and additional items were formulated based on suggestions by clinical experts. All items start with “When I don’t feel well, in order to feel better…”. Participants rated how frequently they used each strategy on a 5-point Likert scale. Confirmatory Factor Analyses were conducted to verify the factor structure in two separate student samples and a clinical sample. Group comparisons and correlations with other questionnaires were calculated to ensure validity. Results After modification, the CFA showed good model fit in all three samples. Reliability scores (Cronbach’s α) for the three NARQ scales ranged between .71 and .80. Comparisons between students and persons with mental disorders showed the postulated relationships, as did comparisons between male and female students and persons with or without Borderline Personality Disorder. Correlations with other questionnaires suggest the NARQ’s construct validity. Conclusions The results indicate that the NARQ is a psychometrically sound and reliable measure with practical use for therapy planning and tracking of treatment outcome across time. We advocate the integration of the new response-focused strategy in the Gross’s model of emotion regulation.
机译:背景技术的负面影响和调节困难与几种不良的心理后果有关。尽管存在一些调查表,但重要的是要有一个基于理论的测量方法,其中应包括与临床相关的项目,并在健康和患者样本中显示出良好的心理测量特性。这项研究旨在开发这样的问卷,将两个毛重[1]量表的重新评估和抑制与一个附加的以反应为中心的量表(称为“外部化行为策略”)相结合,涵盖临床相关项目。方法样本由684名学生(平均年龄== 23.3,SD == 3.5;女性53.6%)和369名患有混合性精神障碍的人(平均年龄== 36.0 SD == 14.6;女性71.2%)组成。问卷项目是从现有问卷中得出的,其他项目是根据临床专家的建议制定的。所有项目均以“当我感觉不舒服时,为了感觉更好……”开头。参与者以5分李克特量表评估他们使用每种策略的频率。进行验证性因子分析以验证两个单独的学生样本和一个临床样本中的因子结构。计算组与其他问卷的比较和相关性以确保有效性。结果修改后,CFA在所有三个样品中均显示出良好的模型拟合。三种NARQ量表的可靠性得分(Cronbach'sα)在0.71和.80之间。学生与精神障碍患者之间的比较表明了假定的关系,男女学生与患有或不患有边缘性人格障碍的患者之间的比较也是如此。与其他问卷的相关性表明NARQ的结构有效。结论结果表明,NARQ是一种心理上合理且可靠的措施,可实际用于治疗计划和跨时间跟踪治疗结果。我们提倡在格罗斯的情绪调节模型中整合以响应为中心的新策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号