首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Lack of controlled studies investigating the risk of postpartum haemorrhage in cesarean delivery after prior use of oxytocin: a scoping review
【24h】

Lack of controlled studies investigating the risk of postpartum haemorrhage in cesarean delivery after prior use of oxytocin: a scoping review

机译:缺乏对照研究来调查事先使用催产素后剖宫产产后出血的风险:一项研究范围回顾

获取原文
           

摘要

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a major cause of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide. Experimental and clinical studies indicate that prolonged oxytocin exposure in the first or second stage of labour may be associated with impaired uterine contractility and an increased risk of atonic PPH. Therefore, particularly labouring women requiring cesarean delivery constitute a subset of patients that may exhibit an unpredictable response to oxytocin. We mapped the evidence for comparative studies investigating the hypothesis whether the risk for PPH is increased in women requiring cesarean section after induction or augmentation of labour. We performed a systematic literature search for clinical trials in Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library (May 2016). Additionally we searched for ongoing or unpublished trials in clinicaltrials.gov and the WHO registry platform. We identified a total of 36 controlled trials investigating the exogenous use of oxytocin in cesarean section. Data were extracted for study key characteristics and the current literature literature was described narratively. Our evidence map shows that the majority of studies investigating the outcome PPH focused on prophylactic oxytocin use compared to other uterotonic agents in the third stage of labour. Only 2 dose-response studies investigated the required oxytocin dose to prevent uterine atony after cesarean delivery for labour arrest. These studies support the hypotheses that labouring women exposed to exogenous oxytocin require a higher oxytocin dose after delivery than non-labouring women to prevent uterine atony after cesarean section. However, the study findings are flawed by limitations of the study design as well as the outcome selection. No clinical trial was identified that directly compared exogenous oxytocin versus no oxytocin application before intrapartum cesarean delivery. Despite some evidence from dose-response studies that the use of oxytocin may increase the risk for PPH in intrapartum cesarean delivery, current research has not investigated the prepartal application of oxytocin in well controlled clinical trials. It was striking that most studies on exogenous oxytocin are focused on PPH prophylaxis in the third stage of labour without differing between the indications of cesarean section and hence the prepartal oxytocin status.
机译:产后出血(PPH)是全球孕产妇死亡和发病的主要原因。实验和临床研究表明,在分娩的第一阶段或第二阶段中长时间服用催产素可能与子宫收缩力受损和无声PPH风险增加有关。因此,特别是需要剖宫产的劳动妇女构成了可能对催产素表现出不可预测反应的一部分患者。我们为进行比较研究的证据作了调查,调查了这一假设,即在引产或增加分娩后需要剖宫产的妇女中PPH的风险是否增加。我们对Medline,Embase,Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆的临床试验进行了系统的文献检索(2016年5月)。此外,我们在Clinicaltrials.gov和WHO注册平台中搜索了正在进行或未发表的试验。我们确定了总共36项对照试验,研究了剖宫产术中外用催产素的情况。提取数据以研究关键特征,并叙述性地描述当前的文献资料。我们的证据图表明,与第三产程其他宫缩剂相比,大多数研究PPH结局的研究都集中在预防性催产素的使用上。只有两项剂量反应研究调查了催产素的剂量,以防止剖宫产分娩后子宫收缩乏力。这些研究支持这样的假设:暴露于外源性催产素的劳动妇女分娩后需要较高的催产素剂量,以防止剖宫产后子宫收缩乏力。但是,研究发现由于研究设计和结果选择的局限性而存在缺陷。没有临床试验能够确定在分娩后剖宫产前直接比较外源性催产素与不应用催产素。尽管有剂量反应研究的证据表明,使用催产素可能会增加产后剖宫产中PPH的风险,但目前的研究尚未在控制良好的临床试验中研究过催产素在产前的应用。令人惊讶的是,大多数关于外源性催产素的研究都集中在第三产程的PPH预防,而剖宫产的指征与产前催产素的状态没有区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号