首页> 外文期刊>BMC Psychiatry >The hospital anxiety and depression rating scale: A cross-sectional study of psychometrics and case finding abilities in general practice
【24h】

The hospital anxiety and depression rating scale: A cross-sectional study of psychometrics and case finding abilities in general practice

机译:医院焦虑和抑郁评分量表:横断面研究心理测量和病例发现能力

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background General practitioners' (GPs) diagnostic skills lead to underidentification of generalized anxiety disorders (GAD) and major depressive episodes (MDE). Supplement of brief questionnaires could improve the diagnostic accuracy of GPs for these common mental disorders. The aims of this study were to examine the usefulness of The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Rating Scale (HADS) for GPs by: 1) Examining its psychometrics in the GPs' setting; 2) Testing its case-finding properties compared to patient-rated GAD and MDE (DSM-IV); and 3) Comparing its case finding abilities to that of the GPs using Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) rating. Methods In a cross-sectional survey study 1,781 patients in three consecutive days in September 2001 attended 141 GPs geographically spread in Norway. Sensitivity, specificity, optimal cut off score, and Area under the curve (AUC) for the HADS and the CGI-S were calculated with Generalized Anxiety Questionnaire (GAS-Q) as reference standard for GAD, and Depression Screening Questionnaire (DSQ) for MDE. Results The HADS-A had optimal cut off ≥8 (sensitivity 0.89, specificity 0.75), AUC 0.88 and 76% of patients were correctly classified in relation to GAD. The HADS-D had by optimal cut off ≥8 (sensitivity 0.80 and specificity 0.88) AUC 0.93 and 87% of the patients were correctly classified in relation to MDE. Proportions of the total correctly classified at the CGI-S optimal cut-off ≥3 were 83% of patients for GAD and 81% for MDE. Conclusion The results indicate that addition of the patients' HADS scores to GPs' information could improve their diagnostic accuracy of GAD and MDE.
机译:背景全科医生(GPs)的诊断技能导致对广泛性焦虑症(GAD)和严重抑郁发作(MDE)的认识不足。补充简短的问卷可以提高全科医生对这些常见精神障碍的诊断准确性。这项研究的目的是通过以下方法来检查《医院焦虑和抑郁量表》(HADS)对全科医生的有用性:1)在全科医生的环境中检查其心理测度; 2)与患者评估的GAD和MDE(DSM-IV)相比,测试其案例发现属性; 3)使用临床总体印象严重程度(CGI-S)评分,将其病例发现能力与全科医生的发现能力进行比较。方法在一项横断面调查研究中,2001年9月,连续三天有1,781名患者就诊了141个GP,分布在挪威。 HADS和CGI-S的敏感性,特异性,最佳截断分数和曲线下面积(AUC)均以GAD的参考标准为广义焦虑问卷(GAS-Q),而抑郁筛查问卷(DSQ)为MDE。结果HADS-A的最佳截止值≥8(敏感性0.89,特异性0.75),AUC 0.88,76%的患者相对于GAD正确分类。 HADS-D的最佳截断值≥8(敏感性0.80,特异性0.88),AUC 0.93,87%的患者相对于MDE正确分类。正确分类为CGI-S最佳截止值≥3的患者中,GAD患者的比例为83%,MDE患者的比例为81%。结论结果表明,将患者的HADS分数添加到GP的信息上可以提高其对GAD和MDE的诊断准确性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号