...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole versus multiple doses for prevention of post-caesarean infection at Bugando Medical Centre in Mwanza, Tanzania: a randomized, equivalence, controlled trial
【24h】

Single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole versus multiple doses for prevention of post-caesarean infection at Bugando Medical Centre in Mwanza, Tanzania: a randomized, equivalence, controlled trial

机译:坦桑尼亚姆万扎的Bugando医疗中心单剂庆大霉素联合甲硝唑与多剂预防剖腹产感染的比较:一项随机对照研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Caesarean section(C/S) has been found to increase rates of maternal infectious morbidities five times more than vaginal delivery. The provision of intravenous prophylactic antibiotics 30 to 60 minutes prior to C/S has been found to substantially reduce post-caesarean infection. At Bugando Medical Centre, there is no consistent protocol for the administration of antibiotic prophylaxis to patients who are undergoing emergency C/S. Providing repeated dosages of antibiotic prophylaxis after C/S is the common practice. This study aimed to determine the comparative efficacy of a single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole versus multiple doses for prevention of post-caesarean infection. Methods From October 2011 to May 2012, a randomized, equivalence, non-blinding clinical trial was conducted at Bugando Medical Centre in Mwanza, Tanzania. A total of 500 eligible participants were enrolled in the study and were randomly allocated into two study arms -- “A” and “B”. Participants in “A” received a single dose of gentamicin in combination with metronidazole 30 to 60 minutes prior to the operation, and participants in “B” received the same drugs prior to the operation but continued with for 24 hours. Both groups had 30 days of follow-up and were assessed for signs and symptoms of surgical-site infection as the primary outcome. The equivalence margin was set at 5%. The two-tailed equivalence was analyzed based on intention- to-treat analysis. Results The randomization was proper, as the distribution of various demographic and other baseline characteristics had a p-value of?>?0.05. All 500 participants were included in our analysis; of these, no participants were lost to follow-up. Surgical-site infection occurred in 12 out of the 250 (4.8%) receiving single dose compared to 16 out of the 250 (6.4%) receiving multiple doses. There is an absolute proportion difference of 1.6% (95% Confidence interval: -2.4 – 5.6%) which lies outside the pre-specified 5% equivalence margin. Conclusion We recommend the administration of pre-operative single dose antibiotic prophylaxis for emergency caesarean as this intervention proved to be not equivalent to multiple doses antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing surgical site infection. Single dose therapy also reduces staff workload along with medication costs. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN44462542
机译:背景技术剖宫产(C / S)被发现比阴道分娩增加了母亲传染病发病率五倍。已发现在C / S前30至60分钟提供静脉预防性抗生素可大大减少剖腹产感染。在Bugando医疗中心,没有针对正在接受紧急C / S的患者进行抗生素预防的一致方案。常见的做法是在C / S后提供重复剂量的抗生素预防药。这项研究旨在确定单剂量庆大霉素与甲硝唑联用与多剂量预防剖腹产后感染的比较疗效。方法2011年10月至2012年5月,在坦桑尼亚Mwanza的Bugando医学中心进行了一项随机,等效,无盲的临床试验。共有500名符合条件的参与者参加了研究,并随机分配到两个研究部门-“ A”和“ B”。 “ A”组的参与者在手术前30至60分钟接受了单剂量的庆大霉素与甲硝唑的联合治疗,“ B”组的参与者在手术前接受了相同的药物,但持续了24小时。两组均进行了30天的随访,并评估了手术部位感染的体征和症状为主要结果。当量裕度设为5%。基于意向性分析分析了两尾等效性。结果随机分组是适当的,因为各种人口统计学特征和其他基线特征的分布的p值≥0.05。所有500名参与者都包括在我们的分析中;其中,没有参与者迷失了后续行动。在接受单剂​​治疗的250名患者中有12名(4.8%)发生了手术部位感染,而在接受多剂治疗的250名患者中(6.4%)有16名发生了手术部位感染。绝对比例差异为1.6%(95%置信区间:-2.4-5.6%),超出了预先规定的5%当量裕度。结论我们建议对紧急剖腹产术前给予单剂量抗生素预防,因为这种干预措施在减少手术部位感染方面不等同于多剂量抗生素预防。单剂量疗法还减少了工作人员的工作量以及药物费用。试用注册电流对照试验ISRCTN44462542

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号