首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pediatrics >Ocular medicines in children: the regulatory situation related to clinical research
【24h】

Ocular medicines in children: the regulatory situation related to clinical research

机译:儿童眼科药物:与临床研究有关的监管情况

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Many ocular medications are prescribed for paediatric patients, but the evidence for their rational use is very scant. This study was planned to compare the availability and the licensing status of ocular medications marketed in Italy, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States of America (USA) related to the amount of published and un-published RCTs testing these drugs in the paediatric population. Methods A quantitative analysis was performed to evaluate the number of ocular medications with a paediatric license in Italy, the UK, and the USA. A literature search was also performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ophthalmic pharmacological therapy in children aged Results In all, of 197 drugs identified, 68 (35%) single drugs are licensed for paediatric use at least in one considered country, while 23 (12%) were marketed in all three countries. More specifically, in Italy 43 single drugs (48% of those marketed) had a paediatric license, while 39 (64%) did in the UK and 22 (54%) did in the USA. Only 13 drugs were marketed with a paediatric license in all countries. The percentage of drugs licensed for paediatric use and for which at least one RCT had been performed ranged between 51% in Italy and 55% in the USA. No published RCTs were found for 11 (48%) drugs licensed for paediatric use in all three countries. In all, 74 (35%) of the retrieved RCTs involved mydriatic/cycloplegic medications. A total of 62 RCTs (56% completed) on 46 drugs were found in the international clinical trial registries. Cyclosporin and bevacizumab were being studied in many ongoing trials. Twenty-six drugs had new paediatric information approved by FDA based on new paediatric clinical trials, while only 4 PIPs were approved by EMA. Conclusions There is a pressing need for further research and clinical development in the pediatric ophthalmic area, where effective up-to-date treatments, and additional research and education on use in children, remain priorities.
机译:背景技术许多眼科药物是为儿科患者开的,但对其合理使用的证据很少。计划进行这项研究,以比较在意大利,英国(UK)和美利坚合众国(USA)销售的眼用药物的可获得性和许可状态,并将其与在2007年对这些药物进行测试的已发表和未发表的RCT数量相关儿科人群。方法在意大利,英国和美国进行了定量分析,以评估获得儿科许可的眼用药物的数量。还对MEDLINE,EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中心注册资料库中的儿童进行了眼药理学治疗的随机对照试验(RCT),进行了文献检索。结果在总共197种确定的药物中,有68种(35%)是单药。至少在一个所考虑的国家/地区获得了儿科使用许可,而在这三个国家/地区都销售了23种(占12%)。更具体地说,在意大利有43种单一药物(占市场销售药物的48%)具有儿科许可,而在英国有39种药物(64%)在美国有22种(54%)。在所有国家中,只有13种具有儿科执照的药物在市场上销售。获许可用于儿科用途且至少已进行一项RCT的药物百分比在意大利的51%和美国的55%之间。在这三个国家中,未发现有11种(48%)已获许可用于儿科的药物的RCT。总共有74例(35%)的RCT涉及散瞳/睫状肌麻痹药物。在国际临床试验注册机构中,共发现了针对46种药物的62个RCT(完成了56%)。许多正在进行的试验中都在研究环孢菌素和贝伐单抗。根据新的儿科临床试验,有26种药物具有FDA批准的新的儿科信息,而EMA仅批准了4种PIP。结论迫切需要在儿科眼科领域进行进一步的研究和临床开发,在这些领域,仍然需要优先考虑有效的最新治疗方法以及对儿童使用的其他研究和教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号