首页> 外文期刊>BMC Neurology >Compare the effect of noninvasive ventilation and tracheotomy in critically ill mechanically ventilated neurosurgical patients: a retrospective observe cohort study
【24h】

Compare the effect of noninvasive ventilation and tracheotomy in critically ill mechanically ventilated neurosurgical patients: a retrospective observe cohort study

机译:比较无创通气和气管切开术对危重机械通气神经外科患者的效果:一项回顾性观察队列研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Patients with severe brain injury is usual at high risk of extubation failure, despite of those with no/minor primary respiratory problem, majority of them still needs long term respiratory support and has severe pulmonary complications. This retrospective study aimed to compare the effect of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and tracheotomy on the prognosis in critically ill mechanically ventilated neurosurgical patients. This is a single center, retrospective observe cohort study. Postoperative patients with brain injury consecutively admitted to ICU from November 1st, 2015 through February 28th, 2017, who had received invasive mechanical ventilation more than 48?h were screened, those who received NIV or tracheotomy procedure, meanwhile with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score between 8 and 13 points before using NIV or undergoing tracheotomy, were retrospectively included in this study. The demographic data and clinical main outcomes such as ICU and hospital mortality, time of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU and hospital were collected. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection between two groups. 77 patients were included in this study. 33 patients received NIV, and 44 patients received tracheotomy through the ICU duration. The incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection in NIV group was significantly lower than that in tracheotomy group (54.5% VS 84.1%, P??0.05), Application of NIV was associated with shorter duration of invasive mechanical ventilation ([median 123.0?h VS 195.0?h, P??0.05). Moreover, GCS score at ICU discharge, as well as the difference of GCS score between at admission to ICU and ICU discharge were also better than the tracheotomy group (P??0.001). Compared with tracheotomy, use of NIV after extubation in critically ill mechanically ventilated neurosurgical patients may be associated with lower incidence of postoperative pulmonary infection, shorter duration of invasive mechanical ventilation and better improvement in brain function. Further studies need to verify the effect of NIV in this kind of patients.
机译:严重的脑损伤患者通常有高的拔管失败风险,尽管那些患者没有/有轻微的原发性呼吸系统疾病,但他们中的大多数仍需要长期的呼吸支持,并具有严重的肺部并发症。这项回顾性研究旨在比较无创通气(NIV)和气管切开术对重症机械通气神经外科患者预后的影响。这是一个单中心,回顾性观察队列研究。自2015年11月1日至2017年2月28日连续入院ICU的有颅脑损伤的术后患者,接受有创机械通气超过48 h的患者进行筛查,接受NIV或气管切开术的患者,同时使用格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)在本研究中回顾性地包括在使用NIV或进行气管切开术之前的8到13分之间的评分。收集人口统计学数据和临床主要结局,例如ICU和医院死亡率,机械通气时间,ICU长度和医院。主要结果是两组之间术后肺部感染的发生率。本研究包括77例患者。在ICU期间,有33例患者接受了NIV,44例患者接受了气管切开术。 NIV组术后肺部感染的发生率显着低于气管切开术组(54.5%VS 84.1%,P 0.05),NIV的应用与有创机械通气时间较短相关([中位数123.0?h VS] 195.0小时,P <0.05。此外,ICU出院时的GCS评分以及入院时ICS与ICU出院时的GCS评分之差也比气管切开术组要好(P <0.001)。与气管切开术相比,危重机械通气神经外科患者拔管后使用NIV可能与术后肺部感染的发生率较低,有创机械通气时间较短和脑功能改善更好有关。进一步的研究需要验证NIV在这类患者中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号