...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >Exploring views on what is important for patient-centred care in end-stage renal disease using Q methodology
【24h】

Exploring views on what is important for patient-centred care in end-stage renal disease using Q methodology

机译:使用Q方法探讨对终末期肾脏疾病以患者为中心的护理重要的观点

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background This study aimed to explore views on what is considered important for Patient-Centred Care (PCC) among patients and the healthcare professionals treating them in a haemodialysis department. Methods Interviews were conducted among 14 patients with end-stage renal disease receiving dialysis and 12 healthcare professionals (i.e. 2 doctors, 4 staff members, and 6 nurses) working at a haemodialysis department. Participants were asked to rank-order 35 statements representing eight dimensions of PCC previously discussed in the literature. Views on PCC, and communalities and differences between them, were explored using by-person factor analysis. Results Four views on what is important for PCC in end-stage renal disease were identified. In viewpoint 1, listening to patients and taking account of their preferences in treatment decisions is considered central to PCC. In viewpoint 2, providing comprehensible information and education to patients so that they can take charge of their own care is considered important. In viewpoint 3, several aspects related to the atmosphere at the department were put forward as important for PCC. In viewpoint 4, having a professional or acquaintance that acts as care coordinator, making treatment decisions with or for them, was considered particularly beneficial. All views agreed about the relative importance of certain PCC dimensions; the patient preferences and information and education dimensions were generally considered most important, while the family and friends and the access to care dimensions were considered least important. Conclusions The four views on PCC among patients in a haemodialysis department and the professionals treating them suggest that there is no one size fits all strategy for providing PCC to patients with end-stage renal disease. Some patients may benefit from educational interventions to improve their self-management skills and place them in charge of their own care, whereas other patients may benefit more from the availability of a care coordinator to make decisions for them, or with them. Furthermore, our results suggest that not all eight dimensions of PCC need to be given equal consideration in the care for patients with end-stage renal disease in order to improve patient outcomes.
机译:背景技术这项研究旨在探讨在血液透析部门的患者以及治疗他们的医护人员中对患者中心护理(PCC)重要的观点。方法对在血液透析部门工作的14名接受透析的终末期肾病患者和12名医疗专业人员(即2名医生,4名职员和6名护士)进行了访谈。要求参与者对35项陈述进行排名,这些陈述代表了先前在文献中讨论过的PCC的八个方面。使用个人因素分析,探讨了PCC以及它们之间的社区和差异的观点。结果确定了对PCC在终末期肾脏疾病中重要的四种观点。在观点1中,听取患者意见并在治疗决策中考虑患者的偏好被认为是PCC的核心。在观点2中,向患者提供可理解的信息和教育以使他们能够自己负责护理是很重要的。在观点3中,提出了与部门气氛有关的几个方面,它们对PCC至关重要。在观点4中,具有专业人员或熟人担任护理协调员,与他们一起或为他们做出治疗决定被认为特别有益。所有观点都同意某些PCC尺寸的相对重要性;通常认为患者的喜好,信息和教育程度最为重要,而家人和朋友以及获得医疗服务的程度则被认为是最不重要的。结论血液透析部门的患者和治疗他们的专业人员对PCC的四种观点表明,没有一种合适的方法可以为终末期肾病患者提供PCC。一些患者可能会从教育干预中受益,以提高他们的自我管理技能并让他们负责自己的护理,而另一些患者则可能会受益于护理协调员为他们或与他们一起做出决策的机会。此外,我们的结果表明,在改善终末期肾病患者的护理中,并不需要同时考虑PCC的所有八个方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号