首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Screening of the spine in adolescents: inter- and intra-rater reliability and measurement error of commonly used clinical tests
【24h】

Screening of the spine in adolescents: inter- and intra-rater reliability and measurement error of commonly used clinical tests

机译:青少年脊柱筛查:评估者间和评估者间的信度和常用临床测试的测量误差

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Evidence on the reliability of clinical tests used for the spinal screening of children and adolescents is currently lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability and measurement error of clinical tests commonly used when screening young spines. Methods Two experienced chiropractors independently assessed 111 adolescents aged 12–14?years who were recruited from a primary school in Denmark. A standardised examination protocol was used to test inter-rater reliability including tests for scoliosis, hypermobility, general mobility, inter-segmental mobility and end range pain in the spine. Seventy-five of the 111 subjects were re-examined after one to four hours to test intra-rater reliability. Percentage agreement and Cohen’s Kappa were calculated for binary variables, and interclass correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots with Limits of Agreement (LoA) were calculated for continuous measures. Results Inter-rater percentage agreement for binary data ranged from 59.5% to 100%. Kappa ranged from 0.06-1.00. Kappa ≥ 0.40 was seen for elbow, thumb, fifth finger and trunk/hip flexion hypermobility, pain response in inter-segmental mobility and end range pain in lumbar flexion and extension. For continuous data, ICCs ranged from 0.40-0.95. Only forward flexion as measured by finger-to-floor distance reached an acceptable ICC(≥ 0.75). Overall, results for intra-rater reliability were better than for inter-rater reliability but for both components, the LoA were quite wide compared with the range of assessments. Conclusion Some clinical tests showed good, and some tests poor, reliability when applied in a spinal screening of adolescents. The results could probably be improved by additional training and further test standardization. This is the first step in evaluating the value of these tests for the spinal screening of adolescents. Future research should determine the association between these tests and current and/or future neck and back pain.
机译:背景技术目前缺乏用于对儿童和青少年进行脊柱筛查的临床测试的可靠性的证据。这项研究的目的是确定评估年轻棘突时常用的临床测试的评分者间和评估者内可靠性和测量误差。方法两名经验丰富的脊医独立评估了从丹麦一所小学招募的111名12-14岁的青少年。标准化检查方案用于测试评分者之间的可靠性,包括脊柱侧弯,活动过度,一般活动性,节间活动性和脊柱末端疼痛的测试。一到四个小时后,对1​​11位受试者中的75位进行了重新检查,以测试评分者内信度。对于二进制变量,计算出百分比一致性和Cohen的Kappa值,并为连续测量计算出类间相关性(ICC)和带有一致性极限(LoA)的Bland-Altman图。结果二进制数据的评分者间一致性百分比为59.5%至100%。卡伯值介于0.06-1.00之间。肘,拇指,无名指和躯干/髋关节屈曲过度活动,节间活动度的疼痛反应以及腰部屈曲和伸展的末端疼痛的Kappa≥0.40。对于连续数据,ICC范围为0.40-0.95。仅通过手指到地板的距离测量的前屈达到了可接受的ICC(≥0.75)。总体而言,评估者内部可靠性的结果要好于评估者之间的可靠性,但与评估范围相比,这两个部分的LoA都相当广泛。结论在对青少年进行脊柱筛查时,一些临床测试显示出良好的可靠性,而另一些测试则较差。通过额外的培训和进一步的测试标准化,可能会改善结果。这是评估这些测试对青少年脊柱筛查的价值的第一步。未来的研究应确定这些测试与当前和/或将来的颈部和背部疼痛之间的关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号