...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Comparison of the Swedish STarT Back Screening Tool and the Short Form of the ?rebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in patients with acute or subacute back and neck pain
【24h】

Comparison of the Swedish STarT Back Screening Tool and the Short Form of the ?rebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in patients with acute or subacute back and neck pain

机译:瑞典STarT背部筛查工具与急性或亚急性背颈部疼痛患者的简短形式的《肌肉骨骼肌肉疼痛筛查问卷》的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Patients with back and neck pain are often seen in primary care and it is important to provide them with tailored interventions based on risk stratification/triage. The STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) is a widely used screening questionnaire which has not yet been validated for a population with back and/or neck pain with short duration. Our aim was to compare the concurrent validity of the SBT and the short form of the ?MPSQ including psychometric properties and clinical utility in a primary care setting. Methods Patients who applied for physiotherapy by direct access (January 2013 to January 2014) at 35 primary care centers in south Sweden, with acute or subacute back and/or neck pain, aged 18–67 years, who were not currently on sick leave or had been on sick leave less than 60?days were asked to complete the SBT and ?MPSQ-short questionnaire ( n =?329). We used the Spearman’s rank correlations to study correlations, cross tabulation and Cohen’s kappa to analyze agreement of patient classification. Clinical utility was described as clinician scoring miscalculations and misclassifications of total and/or subscale scores. Results Completed SBT (9-items) and ?MPSQ-short (10-items) data were available for 315/329 patients respectively. The statistical correlation for SBT and ?MPSQ-short total scores was moderately strong (0.62, p Conclusions The correlation between the SBT and the ?MPSQ-short scores were moderately strong for individuals with acute or subacute back and/or neck pain. SBT seemed to be clinically feasible to use in clinical practice. We therefore suggest that SBT can be used for individuals with both BP and/or NP in primary care settings but it is important to be aware of that SBT’s agreement with the ?MPSQ-short was poor among females aged over 50?years. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02609750 Registered: November 18, 2015.
机译:背景技术背部和颈部疼痛患者经常在初级保健中见到,因此,根据风险分层/分类为他们提供量身定制的干预措施非常重要。 STarT背部筛查工具(SBT)是一种广泛使用的筛查问卷,尚未针对短时间内患有背部和/或颈部疼痛的人群进行验证。我们的目的是比较SBT和简短形式的?MPSQ的并发有效性,包括在初级保健机构中的心理测量特性和临床效用。方法在瑞典南部的35个基层医疗中心通过直接通路申请物理治疗的患者(2013年1月至2014年1月),患有急性或亚急性背部和/或颈部疼痛,年龄18-67岁,目前未请病假或休病假少于60天的被要求填写SBT和?MPSQ-short问卷(n =?329)。我们使用Spearman的排名相关性研究相关性,使用交叉制表法,使用Cohen的kappa分析患者分类的一致性。临床效用被描述为临床医生对总和/或子量表得分的错误计算和错误分类进行评分。结果315/329例患者分别获得完整的SBT(9项)和?MPSQ-short(10项)数据。 SBT和?MPSQ-short总分的统计相关性中等偏强(0.62,p结论)对于急性或亚急性背部和/或颈部疼痛的个体,SBT和?MPSQ-short分数之间的相关性中等偏强。因此,我们建议SBT可用于基层医疗机构同时患有BP和/或NP的患者,但重要的是要意识到SBT与?MPSQ-short的协议很差年龄在50岁以上的女性中进行试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT02609750注册日期:2015年11月18日。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号