...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Nephrology >Is it useful to increase dialysate flow rate to improve the delivered Kt?
【24h】

Is it useful to increase dialysate flow rate to improve the delivered Kt?

机译:增加透析液流速以改善输送的Kt是否有用?

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Increasing dialysate flow rates (Qd) from 500 to 800?ml/min has been recommended to increase dialysis efficiency. A few publications show that increasing Qd no longer led to an increase in mass transfer area coefficient (KoA) or Kt/V measurement. Our objectives were: 1) Studying the effect in Kt of using a Qd of 400, 500, 700?ml/min and autoflow (AF) with different modern dialysers. 2) Comparing the effect on Kt of water consumption vs. dialysis time to obtain an individual objective of Kt (Ktobj) adjusted to body surface. Methods This is a prospective single-centre study with crossover design. Thirty-one patients were studied and six sessions with each Qd were performed. HD parameters were acquired directly from the monitor display: effective blood flow rate (Qbe), Qd, effective dialysis time (Te) and measured by conductivity monitoring, final Kt. Results We studied a total of 637 sessions: 178 with 500?ml/min, 173 with 700?ml/min, 160 with AF and 126 with 400?ml/min. Kt rose a 4% comparing 400 with 500?ml/min, and 3% comparing 500 with 700?ml/min. Ktobj was reached in 82.4, 88.2, 88.2 and 94.1% of patients with 400, AF, 500 and 700?ml/min, respectively. We did not find statistical differences between dialysers. The difference between programmed time and Te was 8′ when Qd was 400 and 500?ml/min and 8.8′ with Qd?=?700?ml/min. Calculating an average time loss of eight minutes/session, we can say that a patient loses 24′ weekly, 312′ monthly and 62.4?hours yearly. Identical Kt could be obtained with Qd of 400 and 500?ml/min, increasing dialysis time 9.1′ and saving 20% of dialysate. Conclusions Our data suggest that increasing Qd over 400?ml/min for these dialysers offers a limited benefit. Increasing time is a better alternative with demonstrated benefits to the patient and also less water consumption.
机译:背景建议将透析液流速(Qd)从500增加至800?ml / min,以提高透析效率。一些出版物表明,增加Qd不再导致传质面积系数(KoA)或Kt / V测量值的增加。我们的目标是:1)研究以400、500、700?ml / min的Qd和采用不同现代透析器的自动流(AF)在Kt中的效果。 2)比较耗水量与透析时间对Kt的影响,以获得针对体表调整的Kt的个人目标(Ktobj)。方法这是一项采用交叉设计的前瞻性单中心研究。研究了31名患者,每个Qd进行了6次治疗。 HD参数直接从监视器显示中获取:有效血液流速(Qbe),Qd,有效透析时间(Te),并通过电导率监测测量,最终Kt。结果我们总共研究了637个疗程:178个以500?ml / min的速度进行,173个以700?ml / min的速度进行,160个以AF进行的运动以及126个以400?ml / min进行的运动。 Kt比400和500?ml / min上升了4%,而500和700?ml / min相比上升了3%。 400,AF,500和700?ml / min的患者分别达到82.4%,88.2%,88.2%和94.1%的Ktobj。我们没有发现透析器之间的统计差异。当Qd为400和500μml/ min时,编程时间与Te之间的差为8′,而Qdδ=≤700μml/ min时为8.8′。通过计算平均每次会议损失的时间为八分钟,可以说一个患者每周损失24',每月损失312',每年损失62.4小时。可以以400和500?ml / min的Qd获得相同的Kt,将透析时间增加9.1',并节省20%的透析液。结论我们的数据表明,将这些透析器的Qd升高超过400?ml / min只能提供有限的益处。增加时间是一种更好的选择,它对患者具有明显的好处,而且耗水量少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号