...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Study protocol of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a biopsychosocial multidisciplinary intervention in the evolution of non-specific sub-acute low back pain in the working population: cluster randomised trial
【24h】

Study protocol of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a biopsychosocial multidisciplinary intervention in the evolution of non-specific sub-acute low back pain in the working population: cluster randomised trial

机译:生物心理社会多学科干预措施在工作人群非特异性亚急性下腰痛演变中的成本效益和成本效用的研究方案:整群随机试验

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Low back pain (LBP), with high incidence and prevalence rate, is one of the most common reasons to consult the health system and is responsible for a significant amount of sick leave, leading to high health and social costs. The objective of the study is to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial educational group intervention (MBEGI) of non-specific sub-acute LBP in comparison with the usual care in the working population recruited in primary healthcare centres. Methods/design The study design is a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of a MBEGI in comparison with the usual care of non-specific sub-acute LBP. Measures on effectiveness and costs of both interventions will be obtained from a cluster randomised controlled clinical trial carried out in 38 Catalan primary health care centres, enrolling 932 patients between 18 and 65 years old with a diagnosis of non-specific sub-acute LBP. Effectiveness measures are: pharmaceutical treatments, work sick leave (% and duration in days), Roland Morris disability, McGill pain intensity, Fear Avoidance Beliefs (FAB) and Golberg Questionnaires. Utility measures will be calculated from the SF-12. The analysis will be performed from a social perspective. The temporal horizon is at 3 months (change to chronic LBP) and 12 months (evaluate the outcomes at long term). Assessment of outcomes will be blinded and will follow the intention-to-treat principle.Discussion We hope to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of MBEGI, see an improvement in the patients' quality of life, achieve a reduction in the duration of episodes and the chronicity of non-specific low back pain, and be able to report a decrease in the social costs. If the intervention is cost-effectiveness and cost-utility, it could be applied to Primary Health Care Centres. Trial registration ISRCTN: ISRCTN58719694
机译:背景技术腰痛(LBP)的发生率和患病率高,是咨询卫生系统的最常见原因之一,并且会导致大量病假,从而导致高昂的健康和社会成本。这项研究的目的是评估与非常规亚急性LBP的多学科生物心理社会教育团体干预(MBEGI)相比,初级保健中心招募的工作人群的常规照护的成本效益和成本效用分析。 。方法/设计与非常规亚急性LBP的常规治疗相比,研究设计是MBEGI的成本-效果和成本-效用分析。两项干预措施的有效性和成本的措施,将从在38个加泰罗尼亚初级卫生保健中心进行的一项随机对照临床试验中获得,该试验招募了932名年龄在18至65岁之间的非特异性亚急性LBP诊断患者。有效性指标包括:药物治疗,病假(%和天数),Roland Morris残疾,McGill疼痛强度,避免恐惧信念(FAB)和Golberg问卷。效用度量将根据SF-12计算得出。分析将从社会角度进行。时间范围为3个月(变为慢性LBP)和12个月(长期评估结局)。结局评估将是盲目的,并将遵循意向性治疗原则。讨论我们希望证明MBEGI的成本效益和成本效用,改善患者的生活质量,缩短病程发作和非特异性下背痛的长期性,并能够报告社会成本的降低。如果干预是成本效益和成本效用,则可以将其应用于初级卫生保健中心。试用注册ISRCTN:ISRCTN58719694

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号