...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders >Agreement between a self-administered questionnaire on musculoskeletal disorders of the neck-shoulder region and a physical examination
【24h】

Agreement between a self-administered questionnaire on musculoskeletal disorders of the neck-shoulder region and a physical examination

机译:关于颈部肩部区域的肌肉骨骼疾病自我调查表与体格检查之间的协议

获取原文
           

摘要

Background In epidemiological studies on neck-shoulder disorders, physical examination by health professionals, although more expensive, is usually considered a better method of data collection than self-administered questionnaires on symptoms. However, little is known on the comparison of these two methods of data collection. The agreement between self-administered questionnaires and the physical examination on the presence of neck-shoulders disorders was assessed in the present study. Methods This study was conducted among clerical workers using video display units. Prevalent cases were workers for whom neck-shoulder symptoms were present for at least 3 days during the previous 7 days and for whom pain intensity was greater than 50 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. All 85 workers meeting this definition and a random sample of 102 workers who did not meet this definition were selected. Physical examination included measures of active range of motion and musculoskeletal strength. Cohen's kappa and global percent agreement were calculated to compare the two methods of data collection. The effect on the agreement of different question and physical examination definitions and the importance of the time interval elapsed between the administrations of the tests were also evaluated. Results Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.19 to 0.54 depending on the definitions used to ascertain disorders. The agreement was highest when the two instruments were administered 21 days apart or less (Kappa = 0.54, global agreement = 77%). It was not substantially improved by the addition of criteria related to functional limitations or when comparisons were made with alternative physical examination definitions. Pain intensity recorded during physical examination maneuvers was an important element of the agreement between questionnaire and physical examination findings. Conclusion These results suggest a fair to good agreement between the presence of musculoskeletal disorders ascertained by self-administered questionnaire and physical examination that may reflect differences in the constructs measured. Shorter time lags result in better agreement. Investigators should consider these results before choosing a method to measure the presence of musculoskeletal disorders in the neck-shoulder region.
机译:背景技术在有关肩甲疾病的流行病学研究中,尽管比起自我管理的症状问卷,卫生专业人员进行的体格检查虽然费用更高,但通常被认为是一种更好的数据收集方法。但是,对这两种数据收集方法的比较了解甚少。在本研究中评估了自我管理的调查表与体格检查有关颈肩疾患之间的一致性。方法本研究是在使用视频显示装置的文书人员中进行的。普遍的病例是在过去的7天内至少有3天出现肩颈症状并且在100毫米视觉模拟量表上其疼痛强度大于50毫米的工人。选择所有符合此定义的85名工人,并随机抽取102名不符合此定义的工人。身体检查包括活动范围和肌肉骨骼力量的测量。计算科恩的kappa和全球百分比协议以比较两种数据收集方法。还评估了不同问题和体格检查定义对一致性的影响以及各次考试之间间隔时间的重要性。结果Kappa系数介于0.19到0.54之间,具体取决于用于确定疾病的定义。当两种仪器相距21天或更短时间给药时,协议最高(Kappa = 0.54,全局协议= 77%)。通过添加与功能限制有关的标准或与其他身体检查定义进行比较时,并没有实质性改善。体格检查过程中记录的疼痛强度是问卷和体格检查结果之间一致性的重要因素。结论这些结果表明,通过自我问卷调查确定的肌肉骨骼疾病的存在与可能反映所测结构差异的体格检查之间存在相当良好的一致性。较短的时间滞后会导致更好的一致性。研究人员在选择一种方法来测量肩颈区域中肌肉骨骼疾病的存在之前,应考虑这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号