首页> 外文期刊>Breast cancer >Can quantitative evaluation of mammographic breast density, “volumetric measurement”, predict the masking risk with dense breast tissue? Investigation by comparison with subjective visual estimation by Japanese radiologists
【24h】

Can quantitative evaluation of mammographic breast density, “volumetric measurement”, predict the masking risk with dense breast tissue? Investigation by comparison with subjective visual estimation by Japanese radiologists

机译:乳腺钼靶乳房密度的定量评估(“体积测量”)能否预测乳腺密集组织的掩盖风险?通过与日本放射科医生的主观视觉估计进行比较来进行调查

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Sensitivity to detect breast cancer (BC) is not high in a dense breast due to masking in mammography. To evaluate the breast density, a volumetric measurement system has been recently developed that measures the percent fibroglandular tissue volume (percent FGV, hereafter termed as “FG%”) to the breast volume (BV). This study was designed to investigate whether evaluation using FG% can accurately predict the masking risk by comparing with the current standard method of subjective visual estimation (SVE). Methods Using pre-biopsy mammograms of 114 cases histopathologically diagnosed with BC in our facility, SVE based on BI-RADS (5th edition) and volumetric measurements of FG% were conducted. Performance to predict the masking risk was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Relationship between these parameters and the masking risk was evaluated by the adjusted multivariate linear regression analysis. Results The AUC of SVE values was 0.742 (95% CI 0.641–0.822), while that of FG% was as significantly low as 0.560 (95% CI 0.427–0.685) ( P ?=?0.0014). The SVE values correlated with the detection of BC in mammography ( P ?=?0.0035), but there was no significant relationship with FG% ( P ?=?0.74). The median BV and FGV were 313?cm_(3)(IQR 191–440) and 63?cm_(3)(IQR 44–102), respectively. The FGV was comparable to the data for Caucasian women reported in previous studies, but the BV was one-half of the previous data. Conclusion The current volumetric measurement system to evaluate FG% to BV was found to be insufficient in the performance to predict the masking risk in Japanese women with relatively small-sized breasts.
机译:背景技术由于乳房X线照相术的掩蔽,在致密的乳房中检测乳腺癌(BC)的敏感性不高。为了评估乳房密度,最近开发了一种体积测量系统,该系统测量纤维腺组织体积百分比(FGV百分比,以下称为“ FG%”)相对于乳房体积(BV)的百分比。这项研究旨在调查与当前的主观视觉评估(SVE)标准方法相比,使用FG%评估是否可以准确预测掩盖风险。方法对我院114例经病理组织学确诊为BC的患者进行活检前的乳房X线照片,以BI-RADS(第5版)为基础进行SVE和FG%的体积测量。使用接收器工作特性曲线(AUC)下的面积评估了预测掩盖风险的性能。通过调整后的多元线性回归分析评估了这些参数与掩盖风险之间的关系。结果SVE值的AUC为0.742(95%CI 0.641-0.822),而FG%的AUC显着低至0.560(95%CI 0.427-0.685)(P≥0.0014)。 SVE值与乳腺摄影中的BC检测相关(P≤0.0053),但与FG%没有显着关系(P≤0.74)。中位BV和FGV分别为313?cm_(3)(IQR 191-440)和63?cm_(3)(IQR 44-102)。 FGV与先前研究中报道的白人女性数据相当,但BV仅为先前数据的一半。结论发现,目前的体积测量系统无法评估FG%占BV的水平,无法充分预测日本乳房相对较小的女性的掩盖风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号