...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews
【24h】

A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews

机译:关于范围审查的进行和报告的范围审查

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Scoping reviews are used to identify knowledge gaps, set research agendas, and identify implications for decision-making. The conduct and reporting of scoping reviews is inconsistent in the literature. We conducted a scoping review to identify: papers that utilized and/or described scoping review methods; guidelines for reporting scoping reviews; and studies that assessed the quality of reporting of scoping reviews. We searched nine electronic databases for published and unpublished literature scoping review papers, scoping review methodology, and reporting guidance for scoping reviews. Two independent reviewers screened citations for inclusion. Data abstraction was performed by one reviewer and verified by a second reviewer. Quantitative (e.g. frequencies of methods) and qualitative (i.e. content analysis of the methods) syntheses were conducted. After searching 1525 citations and 874 full-text papers, 516 articles were included, of which 494 were scoping reviews. The 494 scoping reviews were disseminated between 1999 and 2014, with 45?% published after 2012. Most of the scoping reviews were conducted in North America (53?%) or Europe (38?%), and reported a public source of funding (64?%). The number of studies included in the scoping reviews ranged from 1 to 2600 (mean of 118). Using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology guidance for scoping reviews, only 13?% of the scoping reviews reported the use of a protocol, 36?% used two reviewers for selecting citations for inclusion, 29?% used two reviewers for full-text screening, 30?% used two reviewers for data charting, and 43?% used a pre-defined charting form. In most cases, the results of the scoping review were used to identify evidence gaps (85?%), provide recommendations for future research (84?%), or identify strengths and limitations (69?%). We did not identify any guidelines for reporting scoping reviews or studies that assessed the quality of scoping review reporting. The number of scoping reviews conducted per year has steadily increased since 2012. Scoping reviews are used to inform research agendas and identify implications for policy or practice. As such, improvements in reporting and conduct are imperative. Further research on scoping review methodology is warranted, and in particular, there is need for a guideline to standardize reporting.
机译:范围界定审查用于确定知识差距,设定研究议程并确定对决策的影响。范围审查的进行和报告在文献中是不一致的。我们进行了范围界定审查,以确定:利用和/或描述了范围界定审查方法的论文;报告范围界定审查的准则;以及评估范围界定审查报告质量的研究。我们搜索了9个电子数据库,以查找已发表和未发表的文献范围审查文章,范围审查方法论以及范围审查的报告指南。两名独立审稿人筛选了被纳入的引文。数据抽象由一名审阅者执行,并由另一名审阅者进行验证。进行定量(例如方法的频率)和定性(即方法的含量分析)合成。在搜索1525篇引文和874篇全文后,纳入516篇文章,其中494篇进行了范围界定。在1999年至2014年之间发布了494个范围界定评论,其中2012年以后发布了45%的范围界定。大多数范围界定评论是在北美(53%)或欧洲(38 %%)进行的,并报告了公共资金来源( 64%)。范围界定审查中包括的研究数量为1到2600(平均118)。根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所方法指南进行范围审查,只有13%的范围审查报告使用了协议,36%的人使用了两名审查者来选择要纳入的引文,29%的人使用了两名审查者来进行全文筛选, 30%的人使用了两个审阅者来进行数据图表绘制,而43%的人使用了预定义的图表形式。在大多数情况下,范围界定审查的结果用于确定证据差距(85%),为将来的研究提供建议(84%)或确定优势和局限性(69%)。我们没有确定任何范围界定审查报告指南或评估范围界定审查报告质量的研究。自2012年以来,每年进行的范围界定审查的数量一直在稳定增长。范围界定审查被用于为研究议程提供信息并确定对政策或实践的影响。因此,必须改进报告和行为。有必要对范围界定审查方法进行进一步研究,尤其是需要制定准则来标准化报告。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号