...
首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research >Time course of the hemodynamic responses to aortic depressor nerve stimulation in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats
【24h】

Time course of the hemodynamic responses to aortic depressor nerve stimulation in conscious spontaneously hypertensive rats

机译:自发性高血压大鼠对主动脉降压神经刺激的血流动力学反应的时程

获取原文
           

摘要

The time to reach the maximum response of arterial pressure, heart rate and vascular resistance (hindquarter and mesenteric) was measured in conscious male spontaneously hypertensive (SHR) and normotensive control rats (NCR; Wistar; 18-22 weeks) subjected to electrical stimulation of the aortic depressor nerve (ADN) under thiopental anesthesia. The parameters of stimulation were 1 mA intensity and 2 ms pulse length applied for 5 s, using frequencies of 10, 30, and 90 Hz. The time to reach the hemodynamic responses at different frequencies of ADN stimulation was similar for SHR (N = 15) and NCR (N = 14); hypotension = NCR (4194 ± 336 to 3695 ± 463 ms) vs SHR (3475 ± 354 to 4494 ± 300 ms); bradycardia = NCR (1618 ± 152 to 1358 ± 185 ms) vs SHR (1911 ± 323 to 1852 ± 431 ms), and the fall in hindquarter vascular resistance = NCR (6054 ± 486 to 6550 ± 847 ms) vs SHR (4849 ± 918 to 4926 ± 646 ms); mesenteric = NCR (5574 ± 790 to 5752 ± 539 ms) vs SHR (5638 ± 648 to 6777 ± 624 ms). In addition, ADN stimulation produced baroreflex responses characterized by a faster cardiac effect followed by a vascular effect, which together contributed to the decrease in arterial pressure. Therefore, the results indicate that there is no alteration in the conduction of the electrical impulse after the site of baroreceptor mechanical transduction in the baroreflex pathway (central and/or efferent) in conscious SHR compared to NCR.
机译:在接受电刺激的有意识的雄性自发性高血压(SHR)和血压正常的对照组(NCR; Wistar; 18-22周)中,测量达到最大动脉压,心率和血管阻力(后肢和肠系膜)反应的时间。硫喷妥钠麻醉下的主动脉降压神经(ADN)。刺激的参数是1 mA强度和2 ms脉冲长度,使用10、30和90 Hz的频率施加5 s。对于SHR(N = 15)和NCR(N = 14),在不同频率的ADN刺激下达到血液动力学反应的时间相似。低血压= NCR(4194±336至3695±463 ms)vs SHR(3475±354至4494±300 ms);心动过缓= NCR(1618±152至1358±185 ms)vs SHR(1911±323至1852±431 ms),后肢血管阻力下降= NCR(6054±486至6550±847 ms)vs SHR(4849± 918至4926±646毫秒);肠系膜= NCR(5574±790至5752±539 ms)vs SHR(5638±648至6777±624 ms)。此外,ADN刺激产生压力反射反应,其特征是心脏作用加快,随后是血管作用,共同导致动脉压降低。因此,结果表明,与NCR相比,在有意识的SHR的压力反射通路(中央和/或流出)中的压力感受器机械转导部位之后,电脉冲的传导没有改变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号