首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research >A semi-automatic computerized method to measure baroreflex-mediated heart rate responses that reduces interobserver variability
【24h】

A semi-automatic computerized method to measure baroreflex-mediated heart rate responses that reduces interobserver variability

机译:一种半自动计算机化方法,用于测量压力反射性介导的心率反应,从而减少观察者之间的差异

获取原文
       

摘要

Arterial baroreflex sensitivity estimated by pharmacological impulse stimuli depends on intrinsic signal variability and usually a subjective choice of blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) values. We propose a semi-automatic method to estimate cardiovascular reflex sensitivity to bolus infusions of phenylephrine and nitroprusside. Beat-to-beat BP and HR time series for male Wistar rats (N = 13) were obtained from the digitized signal (sample frequency = 2 kHz) and analyzed by the proposed method (PRM) developed in Matlab language. In the PRM, time series were low-pass filtered with zero-phase distortion (3rd order Butterworth used in the forward and reverse direction) and presented graphically, and parameters were selected interactively. Differences between basal mean values and peak BP (deltaBP) and HR (deltaHR) values after drug infusions were used to calculate baroreflex sensitivity indexes, defined as the deltaHR/deltaBP ratio. The PRM was compared to the method traditionally (TDM) employed by seven independent observers using files for reflex bradycardia (N = 43) and tachycardia (N = 61). Agreement was assessed by Bland and Altman plots. Dispersion among users, measured as the standard deviation, was higher for TDM for reflex bradycardia (0.60 ± 0.46 vs 0.21 ± 0.26 bpm/mmHg for PRM, P
机译:通过药理冲动刺激估计的动脉压力反射敏感性取决于内在的信号变异性,通常取决于血压(BP)和心率(HR)值的主观选择。我们提出了一种半自动方法来估计对苯肾上腺素和硝普钠大剂量输注的心血管反射敏感性。从数字化信号(采样频率= 2 kHz)获得雄性Wistar大鼠(N = 13)的逐搏BP和HR时间序列,并通过Matlab语言开发的拟议方法(PRM)进行分析。在PRM中,对时间序列进行低通滤波并进行零相位失真处理(正向和反向使用三阶Butterworth)并以图形方式显示,然后交互选择参数。药物输注后的基础平均值与峰值BP(deltaBP)和HR(deltaHR)值之间的差异用于计算压力反射敏感性指数,定义为deltaHR / deltaBP比。将PRM与七个独立观察者使用的传统方法(TDM)进行比较,使用反射性心动过缓(N = 43)和心动过速(N = 61)的文件。协议由Bland和Altman地块评估。对于反射性心动过缓,TDM的使用者分散度以标准偏差衡量较高(PRM,P为0.60±0.46 vs 0.21±0.26 bpm / mmHg

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号