首页> 外文期刊>Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation >Health related quality of life and psychopathological distress in risk taking and self-harming adolescents with full-syndrome, subthreshold and without borderline personality disorder: rethinking the clinical cut-off?
【24h】

Health related quality of life and psychopathological distress in risk taking and self-harming adolescents with full-syndrome, subthreshold and without borderline personality disorder: rethinking the clinical cut-off?

机译:与健康相关的生活质量和精神病,精神障碍,冒险和自残青少年的全综合征,亚阈值且无边缘性人格障碍:是否需要重新考虑临床界限?

获取原文
       

摘要

BackgroundDiagnostic standards do not acknowledge developmental specifics and differences in the clinical presentation of adolescents with borderline personality disorder (BPD). BPD is associated with severe impairments in health related quality of life (HRQoL) and increased psychopathological distress. Previously no study addressed differences in HRQoL and psychopathology in adolescents with subthreshold and full-syndrome BPD as well as adolescents at-risk for the development but no current BPD. MethodsDrawing on data from a consecutive sample of N =?264 adolescents (12–17 years) presenting with risk-taking and self-harming behavior at a specialized outpatient clinic, we investigated differences in HRQoL (KIDSCREEN-52) and psychopathological distress (SCL-90-R) comparing adolescents with no BPD (less than 3 criteria fulfilled), to those with subthreshold (3–4 BPD criteria) and full-syndrome BPD (5 or more BPD criteria). Group differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with Sidak corrected contrasts or Chi-Square test for categorical variables. ResultsAdolescents with subthreshold and full-syndrome BPD presented one year later at our clinic and were more likely female. Adolescents with subthreshold and full-syndrome BPD showed greater Axis-I and Axis-II comorbidity compared to adolescents with no BPD, and reported greater risk-taking behaviour, self-injury and suicidality. Compared to those without BPD, adolescents with subthreshold and full-syndrome BPD reported significantly reduced HRQoL. Adolescents with sub-threshold BPD and those with full-syndrome BPD did not differ on any HRQoL dimension, with the exception of Self-Perception . Similar, groups with sub-threshold and full-syndrome BPD showed no significant differences on any dimension of self-reported psychopathological distress, with the exception of Hostility . ConclusionsFindings highlight that subthreshold BPD in adolescents is associated with impairments in HRQoL and psychopathological distress comparable to full-syndrome BPD. Findings raise awareness on the importance of early detection and question the diagnostic validity and clinical utility of existing cut-offs. Findings support a lower diagnostic cut-off for adolescent BPD, to identify those at-risk at an early stage.
机译:背景诊断标准不承认青少年边缘性人格障碍(BPD)的发展特点和临床表现差异。 BPD与健康相关的生活质量(HRQoL)严重受损和心理病理困扰增加有关。以前,尚无研究针对阈下和全综合征BPD的青少年以及有发展风险的青少年但目前没有BPD的HRQoL和心理病理学差异。方法利用连续的N =?264名青少年(12至17岁)在专业门诊中表现出冒险和自我伤害行为的数据,我们调查了HRQoL(KIDSCREEN-52)和心理病理困扰(SCL)的差异-90-R)将没有BPD(满足3个以下标准)的青少年与低于阈值(3-4个BPD标准)和全综合征BPD(5个或更多BPD标准)的青少年进行了比较。使用Sidak校正的对比或卡方检验对分类变量进行单向方差分析来分析组差异。结果一年后,患有阈下和全综合征BPD的青少年出现在我们的诊所,并且更有可能是女性。与没有BPD的青少年相比,具有阈下阈和全综合征BPD的青少年显示出更高的Axis-I和Axis-II合并症,并且报告了更大的冒险行为,自残和自杀倾向。与没有BPD的青少年相比,患有阈下和全综合征BPD的青少年报告HRQoL明显降低。亚阈值BPD的青少年和全综合征BPD的青少年在HRQoL维度上没有差异,除了自我感知能力。相似地,具有亚阈值和全综合征BPD的组在自我报告的心理病理困扰的任何方面都没有显着差异,敌意除外。结论研究结果表明,与全综合征BPD相比,青少年的阈下BPD与HRQoL损伤和精神病理困扰有关。这些发现提高了人们对早期发现的重要性的认识,并对现有临界值的诊断有效性和临床实用性提出了质疑。研究结果支持降低青少年BPD的诊断临界值,以便在早期发现高危人群。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号