首页> 外文期刊>BioData Mining >Semantics-based plausible reasoning to extend the knowledge coverage of medical knowledge bases for improved clinical decision support
【24h】

Semantics-based plausible reasoning to extend the knowledge coverage of medical knowledge bases for improved clinical decision support

机译:基于语义的合理推理可扩展医学知识库的知识范围,从而改善临床决策支持

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Capturing complete medical knowledge is challenging-often due to incomplete patient Electronic Health Records (EHR), but also because of valuable, tacit medical knowledge hidden away in physicians’ experiences. To extend the coverage of incomplete medical knowledge-based systems beyond their deductive closure, and thus enhance their decision-support capabilities, we argue that innovative, multi-strategy reasoning approaches should be applied. In particular, plausible reasoning mechanisms apply patterns from human thought processes, such as generalization, similarity and interpolation, based on attributional, hierarchical, and relational knowledge. Plausible reasoning mechanisms include inductive reasoning , which generalizes the commonalities among the data to induce new rules, and analogical reasoning , which is guided by data similarities to infer new facts. By further leveraging rich, biomedical Semantic Web ontologies to represent medical knowledge, both known and tentative, we increase the accuracy and expressivity of plausible reasoning, and cope with issues such as data heterogeneity, inconsistency and interoperability. In this paper, we present a Semantic Web-based, multi-strategy reasoning approach, which integrates deductive and plausible reasoning and exploits Semantic Web technology to solve complex clinical decision support queries. Results We evaluated our system using a real-world medical dataset of patients with hepatitis, from which we randomly removed different percentages of data (5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) to reflect scenarios with increasing amounts of incomplete medical knowledge. To increase the reliability of the results, we generated 5 independent datasets for each percentage of missing values, which resulted in 20 experimental datasets (in addition to the original dataset). The results show that plausibly inferred knowledge extends the coverage of the knowledge base by, on average, 2%, 7%, 12%, and 16% for datasets with, respectively, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% of missing values. This expansion in the KB coverage allowed solving complex disease diagnostic queries that were previously unresolvable, without losing the correctness of the answers. However, compared to deductive reasoning, data-intensive plausible reasoning mechanisms yield a significant performance overhead. Conclusions We observed that plausible reasoning approaches, by generating tentative inferences and leveraging domain knowledge of experts, allow us to extend the coverage of medical knowledge bases, resulting in improved clinical decision support. Second, by leveraging OWL ontological knowledge, we are able to increase the expressivity and accuracy of plausible reasoning methods. Third, our approach is applicable to clinical decision support systems for a range of chronic diseases.
机译:背景技术掌握完整的医学知识颇具挑战性-通常是由于患者电子病历(EHR)不完整,而且还因为医生的经验中隐藏了宝贵的隐性医学知识。为了将不完整的基于医学知识的系统的范围扩展到演绎性封闭之外,从而增强其决策支持能力,我们认为应采用创新的多策略推理方法。尤其是,合理的推理机制基于归因,层次和关系知识,运用人类思维过程中的模式,例如概化,相似性和内插。合理的推理机制包括归纳推理和归纳推理,归纳推理将数据之间的通用性归纳为新规则,而类推推理则由数据相似性来推断新事实。通过进一步利用丰富的生物医学语义网本体来表示已知和试验性的医学知识,我们提高了合理推理的准确性和表达能力,并解决了数据异质性,不一致和互操作性等问题。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于语义Web的多策略推理方法,该方法融合了演绎和合理的推理,并利用语义Web技术来解决复杂的临床决策支持查询。结果我们使用真实的肝炎患者医学数据集评估了我们的系统,从中我们随机删除了不同百分比的数据(5%,10%,15%和20%),以反映随着不完全医学知识数量的增加而发生的情况。为了提高结果的可靠性,我们为缺失值的每个百分比生成了5个独立的数据集,这产生了20个实验数据集(除了原始数据集之外)。结果表明,对于数据集分别为5%,10%,15%和20%的数据集,合理推断的知识平均将知识库的覆盖范围扩大了2%,7%,12%和16%。缺少值。 KB覆盖率的这种扩展允许解决以前无法解决的复杂疾病诊断查询,而不会丢失答案的正确性。但是,与演绎推理相比,数据密集型合理推理机制产生了显着的性能开销。结论我们观察到,通过产生尝试性推论并利用专家的领域知识,合理的推理方法使我们能够扩展医学知识库的覆盖范围,从而改善临床决策支持。第二,通过利用OWL本体论知识,我们能够提高合理推理方法的表达性和准确性。第三,我们的方法适用于一系列慢性疾病的临床决策支持系统。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号