...
首页> 外文期刊>Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research >PCR-RFLP assay as an option for primary HPV test
【24h】

PCR-RFLP assay as an option for primary HPV test

机译:PCR-RFLP检测可作为主要HPV检测的选择

获取原文

摘要

Persistent human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is an essential factor of cervical cancer. This study evaluated the analytical performance of restriction fragment length polymorphism polymerase chain reaction (PCR-RFLP) assay compared to PapilloCheck? microarray to identify human papilloma virus (HPV) in cervical cells. Three hundred and twenty-five women were analyzed. One sample was used for conventional cytology and another sample was collected using BD SurePath? kit for HPV tests. Eighty samples (24.6%) were positive for HPV gene by PCR-Multiplex and were then submitted to PCR-RFLP and PapilloCheck? microarray. There was a genotyping agreement in 71.25% (57/80) on at least one HPV type between PCR-RFLP and PapilloCheck? microarray. In 22 samples (27.5%), the results were discordant and those samples were additionally analyzed by DNA sequencing. HPV 16 was the most prevalent HPV type found in both methods, followed by HPVs 53, 68, 18, 39, and 66 using PCR-RFLP analysis, and HPVs 39, 53, 68, 56, 31, and 66 using PapilloCheck? microarray. In the present study, a perfect agreement using Cohen's kappa (κ) was found in HPV 33 and 58 (κ=1), very good for HPV 51, and good for types 16, 18, 53, 59, 66, 68, 70, and 73. PCR-RFLP analysis identified only 25% (20/80) HPV coinfection, and PapilloCheck? microarray found 62.5% (50/80). Our Cohen's kappa results indicate that our in-house HPV genotyping testing (PCR-RFLP analysis) could be applied as a primary HPV test screening, especially in low income countries. If multiple HPV types are found in this primary test, a more descriptive test, such as PapilloCheck? microarray, could be performed.
机译:持久性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染是宫颈癌的重要因素。这项研究评估了与PapilloCheck?相比,限制性片段长度多态性聚合酶链反应(PCR-RFLP)分析的分析性能。芯片可鉴定宫颈细胞中的人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)。分析了325名女性。一个样品用于常规细胞学检查,另一个样品使用BDSurePath®收集。 HPV检测试剂盒。 PCR-Multiplex检测到80份样本(24.6%)的HPV基因呈阳性,然后送至PCR-RFLP和PapilloCheck?芯片。 PCR-RFLP和PapilloCheck之间至少有一种HPV类型有71.25%(57/80)的基因分型协议。芯片。在22个样品中(27.5%),结果不一致,并通过DNA测序进一步分析了这些样品。 HPV 16是两种方法中发现的最普遍的HPV类型,其次是使用PCR-RFLP分析的HPV 53、68、18、39和66,以及使用PapilloCheck?HPV 39、53、68、56、31和66。芯片。在本研究中,在HPV 33和58(κ= 1)中发现了使用Cohenκ(κ)的完美协议,对HPV 51非常好,对类型16、18、53、59、66、68、70也很好,以及73. PCR-RFLP分析仅鉴定出25%(20/80)HPV合并感染和PapilloCheck?发现微阵列62.5%(50/80)。我们Cohen的kappa结果表明,我们内部的HPV基因分型检测(PCR-RFLP分析)可以用作主要的HPV检测筛选,尤其是在低收入国家。如果在此主要测试中发现多种HPV类型,则使用更具描述性的测试,例如PapilloCheck?芯片,可以执行。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号