首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Effectiveness of hepatoprotective drugs for anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity: a retrospective analysis
【24h】

Effectiveness of hepatoprotective drugs for anti-tuberculosis drug-induced hepatotoxicity: a retrospective analysis

机译:肝保护药对抗结核药引起的肝毒性的有效性:回顾性分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The effectiveness of hepatoprotective drugs for DIH (drug induced hepatotoxicity) during tuberculosis treatment is not clear. We evaluated the effectiveness of hepatoprotective drugs by comparing the period until the normalization of hepatic enzymes between patients who were prescribed with the hepatoprotective drugs after DIH was occurred and patients who were not prescribed with the hepatoprotective drugs. Methods During 2006–2010, 389 patients with active tuberculosis were included in this study. DIH was defined as elevation of peak serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) of more than twice the upper limit of normal (ULN). We divided the patients into the severe (peak serum AST and/or ALT elevation of >5 times the ULN), moderate (peak serum AST and/or ALT elevation of >3 to ≤5 times the ULN), and mild DIH groups (peak serum AST and/or ALT elevation of >2 to ≤3 times the ULN). We compared the average period until the normalization of hepatic enzymes between patient subgroups with and without hepatoprotective drugs (ursodeoxycholic acid: UDCA, stronger neo-minophagen C: SNMC, and glycyrrhizin). Results In the severe group, there was no significant difference in the average period until the normalization between subgroups with and without hepatoprotective drugs (21.4?±?10.8 vs 21.5?±?11.1?days, P =?0.97). In the mild group, the period was longer in the subgroup with hepatoprotective drugs than that without hepatoprotective drugs (15.7?±?6.2 vs 12.4?±?7.9?days, P =?0.046). Conclusion Regardless of the severity, hepatoprotective drugs did not shorten the period until the normalization of hepatic enzymes.
机译:背景技术尚不清楚在肺结核治疗期间肝保护药物对DIH(药物诱导的肝毒性)的有效性。我们通过比较发生DIH后服用保肝药的患者和未服用保肝药的患者之间直到肝酶正常化为止的时间来评估保肝药的有效性。方法2006年至2010年,本研究共纳入389例活动性结核病患者。 DIH被定义为峰值血清天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)和/或丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)升高超过正常上限(ULN)的两倍。我们将患者分为重度(峰值血清AST和/或ALT升高>正常值上限的5倍),中度(峰值血清AST和/或ALT升高>正常值上限的3到≤5倍)和轻度DIH组(血清AST和/或ALT峰值升高> 2倍至ULN的≤3倍。我们比较了有和没有肝保护药物(熊去氧胆酸:UDCA,更强的新氨基pha C:SNMC和甘草甜素)的患者亚组之间平均肝酶正常化的时间。结果在重度组中,有和没有肝保护药物的亚组之间的平均时间直到标准化为止没有显着差异(21.4±±10.8天vs 21.5±±11.1天),P =±0.97)。在轻度组中,具有肝保护药物的亚组的时间比没有肝保护药物的亚组的时间更长(15.7±±6.2天vs 12.4±±7.9天,P =±0.046)。结论不论严重程度如何,直到肝酶正常化后,保肝药物才可以缩短疗程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号