首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >A retrospective observational study on the efficacy of colistin by inhalation as compared to parenteral administration for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia associated with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa
【24h】

A retrospective observational study on the efficacy of colistin by inhalation as compared to parenteral administration for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia associated with multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa

机译:回顾性观察研究吸入粘杆菌素与肠胃外给药相比与多药耐药的铜绿假单胞菌相关的医院内肺炎的疗效

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Colistin is used as last treatment option for pneumonia associated with multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas spp.. Literature about the best administration mode (inhalation versus parenteral treatment) is lacking. Methods A retrospective study of 20 intensive care patients with a pneumonia associated with MDR P. aeruginosa receiving colistin sulphomethate sodium (Colistineb?) between 2007 and 2009 was performed. A strain was considered multidrug-resistant if it was resistant to at least 6 of the following antibiotics: piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, meropenem, aztreonam, ciprofloxacin, and amikacin. The administration mode, predicted mortality based on the SAPS3 score, SOFA score at onset of the colistin treatment, clinical and microbiological response, and mortality during the episode of the infection were analysed. The non parametric Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher's Exact test were used for statistical analysis of respectively the predicted mortality/SOFA score and mortality rate. Results Six patients received colistin by inhalation only, 5 were treated only parenterally, and 9 by a combination of both administration modes. All patients received concomitant beta-lactam therapy. The mean predicted mortalities were respectively 72%, 68%, and 69% (p = 0.91). SOFA scores at the onset of the treatment were also comparable (p = 0.87). Clinical response was favorable in all patients receiving colistin by inhalation (6/6) and in 40% (2/5) of the patients receiving colistin parenterally (p = 0.06). In the patients with colistin administered both via inhalation and parenterally, clinical response was favorable in 78% of the patients (7/9) (p = 0.27 as compared to the treatment group receiving colistin only parenterally). When all patients with inhalation therapy were compared to the group without inhalation therapy, a favorable clinical response was present in respectively 87% and 40% (p = 0.06). In none of the patients, the Pseudomonas spp. was eradicated from the follow-up cultures. All patients in the parenterally treated group died. None of the patients receiving colistin by inhalation, and 3 of 9 patients of the combination group eventually died (p = 0.002 and p = 0.03 respectively as compared to the group receiving colistin only parenterally). Conclusions Aerosolized colistin could be beneficial as adjunctive treatment for the management of pneumonia due to MDR P. aeruginosa.
机译:背景Colistin被用作与多药耐药性(MDR)假单胞菌(Pseudomonas spp。)相关的肺炎的最后治疗选择。目前尚无关于最佳给药方式(吸入与肠胃外治疗)的文献报道。方法回顾性分析2007年至2009年期间接受铜绿蛋白硫酸甲酯钠(Colistineb ?)的20例重症监护与肺炎合并铜绿假单胞菌相关的肺炎的患者。如果菌株对以下至少六种抗生素具有抗性,则认为该菌株具有多重耐药性:哌拉西林-他唑巴坦,头孢他啶,头孢吡肟,美罗培南,氨曲南,环丙沙星和丁胺卡那霉素。分析了给药方式,基于SAPS3评分的预测死亡率,大肠菌素治疗开始时的SOFA评分,临床和微生物反应以及感染期间的死亡率。非参数Kruskal-Wallis和Fisher精确检验分别用于预测死亡率/ SOFA得分和死亡率的统计分析。结果6例患者仅通过吸入接受粘菌素治疗,5例仅接受肠胃外治疗,9例通过两种给药方式联合使用。所有患者均接受了β-内酰胺治疗。平均预测死亡率分别为72%,68%和69%(p = 0.91)。治疗开始时的SOFA评分也相当(p = 0.87)。在所有通过吸入接受粘菌素的患者中,临床反应均良好(6/6),在非肠道接受粘菌素的患者中,有40%(2/5)(p = 0.06)。在通过吸入和肠胃外给药方式进行粘菌素治疗的患者中,78%的患者的临床反应良好(7/9)(与仅通过胃肠外接受粘菌素的治疗组相比,p = 0.27)。当将所有接受吸入治疗的患者与未接受吸入治疗的组进行比较时,分别有87%和40%的患者出现了良好的临床反应(p = 0.06)。在所有患者中,假单胞菌都没有。从后续文化中被根除。肠胃外治疗组中的所有患者均死亡。吸入性粘菌素的患者均无一死亡,联合组的9名患者中有3例最终死亡(与仅胃肠外粘菌素的组相比,分别为p = 0.002和p​​ = 0.03)。结论气溶胶化粘菌素可作为辅助治疗铜绿假单胞菌引起的肺炎。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号