...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Laboratory methods for case finding in human psittacosis outbreaks: a systematic review
【24h】

Laboratory methods for case finding in human psittacosis outbreaks: a systematic review

机译:在人类鹦鹉热暴发中发现病例的实验室方法:系统评价

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Psittacosis outbreak investigations require rapid identification of cases in order to trace possible sources and perform public health risk assessments. In recent outbreaks in the Netherlands, such investigations were hampered by the non-specificity of laboratory testing methods to identify human Chlamydia psittaci infections. A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus databases of literature published between 01 January, 1986 and 03 July, 2017 was done to find best practices of laboratory-testing methods used in psittacosis outbreaks of two or more human cases. Reference lists of included articles were hand searched to identify additional articles. Thirty-seven eligible articles were identified, describing 44 human psittacosis outbreaks in 12 countries. Laboratory tests performed were PCR (with various targets), serologic tests (complement binding reactions, ELISA’s, immunofluorescence tests and immuno-peroxidase tests) and culture, in various combinations. The literature provided no ‘gold standard’ laboratory testing strategy to identify recent human C. psittaci infections. In most psittacosis outbreaks, for a considerable number of cases (or tested individuals in an exposed cohort), C. psittaci infection could not be confirmed, nor excluded as causative pathogen. None of the testing strategies was found to be suitable for (nearly) full case finding. PCR enables rapid identification of human psittacosis patients and helps source finding by genotyping but has the disadvantage that sensitivity is high only in the acute phase. In outbreak situations, there is often a time delay and therefore, there is a need for new serologic testing methods next to PCR, with good specificity and sensitivity. Moreover, serum is easier to collect than the preferred diagnostic materials for PCR. A serologic test that can reliably confirm infection status without the necessity of convalescent serum sampling would enhance case finding, source tracing, identification of risk factors and assessment of burden of disease in various settings.
机译:牛皮癣暴发调查需要快速识别病例,以追踪可能的来源并进行公共卫生风险评估。在荷兰最近的暴发中,此类调查因实验室检测方法的非特异性而难以识别人类鹦鹉热衣原体感染。我们对1986年1月1日至2017年7月3日之间发表的PubMed和Scopus文献数据库进行了系统搜索,以找到用于两个或多个人类病例的鹦鹉热暴发的实验室测试方法的最佳实践。手工搜索包括文章的参考列表,以识别其他文章。确定了37篇符合条件的文章,描述了12个国家中的44例人类鹦鹉热暴发。进行的实验室测试包括PCR(具有各种靶标),血清学测试(补体结合反应,ELISA,免疫荧光测试和免疫过氧化物酶测试)和培养,多种组合。文献没有提供“金标准”实验室检测策略来鉴定最近的人类鹦鹉热衣原体感染。在大多数鹦鹉热疫情暴发中,对于相当多的病例(或暴露人群中经过测试的个体),不能确认鹦鹉热梭菌感染,也没有将其作为病原体。发现没有一种测试策略适合(几乎)完整的案例发现。 PCR可以快速鉴定人类鹦鹉热患者,并通过基因分型帮助寻找病源,但缺点是灵敏度仅在急性期高。在暴发情况下,通常会有时间延迟,因此,除了PCR之外,还需要具有良好特异性和敏感性的新型血清学检测方法。而且,与优选的PCR诊断材料相比,血清更易于收集。血清学测试可以可靠地确认感染状态而无需恢复血清,可以在各种情况下增强病例发现,来源追踪,危险因素识别和疾病负担评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号