...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Infectious Diseases >Acute undifferentiated fever in India: a multicentre study of aetiology and diagnostic accuracy
【24h】

Acute undifferentiated fever in India: a multicentre study of aetiology and diagnostic accuracy

机译:印度急性未分化发热:病因学和诊断准确性的多中心研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The objectives of this study were to determine the proportion of malaria, bacteraemia, scrub typhus, leptospirosis, chikungunya and dengue among hospitalized patients with acute undifferentiated fever in India, and to describe the performance of standard diagnostic methods. Methods During April 2011–November 2012, 1564 patients aged ≥5?years with febrile illness for 2–14?days were consecutively included in an observational study at seven community hospitals in six states in India. Malaria microscopy, blood culture, Dengue rapid NS1 antigen and IgM Combo test, Leptospira IgM ELISA, Scrub typhus IgM ELISA and Chikungunya IgM ELISA were routinely performed at the hospitals. Second line testing, Dengue IgM capture ELISA (MAC-ELISA), Scrub typhus immunofluorescence (IFA), Leptospira Microscopic Agglutination Test (MAT), malaria PCR and malaria immunochromatographic rapid diagnostic test (RDT) Parahit Total? were performed at the coordinating centre. Convalescence samples were not available. Case definitions were as follows: Leptospirosis: Positive ELISA and positive MAT. Scrub typhus: Positive ELISA and positive IFA. Dengue: Positive RDT and/or positive MAC-ELISA. Chikungunya: Positive ELISA. Bacteraemia: Growth in blood culture excluding those defined as contaminants. Malaria: Positive genus-specific PCR. Results Malaria was diagnosed in 17% (268/1564) and among these 54% had P. falciparum. Dengue was diagnosed in 16% (244/1564). Bacteraemia was found in 8% (124/1564), and among these Salmonella typhi or S. paratyphi constituted 35%. Scrub typhus was diagnosed in 10%, leptospirosis in 7% and chikungunya in 6%. Fulfilling more than one case definition was common, most frequent in chikungunya where 26% (25/98) also had positive dengue test. Conclusions Malaria and dengue were the most common causes of fever in this study. A high overlap between case definitions probably reflects high prevalence of prior infections, cross reactivity and subclinical infections, rather than high prevalence of coinfections. Low accuracy of routine diagnostic tests should be taken into consideration when approaching the patient with acute undifferentiated fever in India.
机译:背景技术这项研究的目的是确定印度住院的急性未分化发热患者中的疟疾,菌血症,灌木斑疹伤寒,钩端螺旋体病,基孔肯雅热和登革热的比例,并描述标准诊断方法的性能。方法在2011年4月至2012年11月期间,对印度6个州的7家社区医院连续进行了一项观察性研究,纳入了1564例≥5岁的2岁至14天的高热病患者。医院常规进行疟疾显微镜检查,血液培养,登革热快速NS1抗原和IgM Combo测试,钩端螺旋体IgM ELISA,斑疹伤寒IgM ELISA和基孔肯雅IgM ELISA。二线测试,登革热IgM捕获ELISA(MAC-ELISA),灌木型斑疹伤寒免疫荧光(IFA),钩端螺旋体显微镜凝集试验(MAT),疟疾PCR和疟疾免疫色谱快速诊断试验(RDT)在协调中心进行。恢复期样品不可用。病例定义如下:钩端螺旋体病:ELISA阳性和MAT阳性。擦洗斑疹伤寒:ELISA阳性和IFA阳性。登革热:RDT阳性和/或MAC-ELISA阳性。基孔肯雅热:ELISA阳性。细菌血症:血液培养中的生长,不包括那些被定义为污染物的细菌。疟疾:属特异性阳性PCR。结果疟疾被诊断为17%(268/1564),其中54%为恶性疟原虫。登革热的诊断率为16%(244/1564)。发现细菌血症的比例为8%(124/1564),其中伤寒沙门氏菌或副伤寒沙门氏菌占35%。诊断出斑疹伤寒10%,钩端螺旋体病7%,基孔肯雅病6%。超过一种病例的定义很常见,在基孔肯雅热最常见,那里26%(25/98)的登革热试验也呈阳性。结论疟疾和登革热是本研究中最常见的发烧原因。病例定义之间的高度重叠可能反映了先前感染,交叉反应和亚临床感染的高流行,而不是合并感染的高流行。在印度接受急性未分化发热患者时,应考虑常规诊断测试的准确性较低。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号