首页> 外文期刊>BMC Anesthesiology >A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure
【24h】

A randomized prospective controlled trial comparing the laryngeal tube suction disposable and the supreme laryngeal mask airway: the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal seal pressure

机译:一项随机前瞻性对照试验,比较了一次性使用喉管吸引器和最高喉罩呼吸道:头颈位置对口咽密封压力的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background The Laryngeal Tube Suction Disposable (LTS-D) and the Supreme Laryngeal Mask Airway (SLMA) are second generation supraglottic airway devices (SADs) with an added channel to allow gastric drainage. We studied the efficacy of these devices when using pressure controlled mechanical ventilation during general anesthesia for short and medium duration surgical procedures and compared the oropharyngeal seal pressure in different head and-neck positions. Methods Eighty patients in each group had either LTS-D or SLMA for airway management. The patients were recruited in two different institutions. Primary outcome variables were the oropharyngeal seal pressures in neutral, flexion, extension, right and left head-neck position. Secondary outcome variables were time to achieve an effective airway, ease of insertion, number of attempts, maneuvers necessary during insertion, ventilatory parameters, success of gastric tube insertion and incidence of complications. Results The oropharyngeal seal pressure achieved with the LTS-D was higher than the SLMA in, (extension ( p =0.0150) and right position ( p =0.0268?? at 60?cm H2O intracuff pressures and nearly significant in neutral position ( p =?0.0571). The oropharyngeal seal pressure was significantly higher with the LTS-D during neck extension as compared to SLMA ( p =?0.015). Similar oropharyngeal seal pressures were detected in all other positions with each device. The secondary outcomes were comparable between both groups. Patients ventilated with LTS-D had higher incidence of sore throat ( p =?0.527). No major complications occurred. Conclusions Better oropharyngeal seal pressure was achieved with the LTS-D in?head-neck right and extension positions?, although it did not appear to have significance in alteration of management using pressure control mechanical ventilation in neutral position. The fiberoptic view was better with the SLMA. The post-operative sore throat incidence was higher in the LTS-D. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02856672 , Unique Protocol ID:BnaiZionMC-16-LG-001, Registered: August 2016.
机译:背景技术一次性喉管吸引器(LTS-D)和最高喉罩气道(SLMA)是第二代声门上气道装置(SAD),具有增加的通道以允许胃部引流。我们在短期和中期手术过程中,在全身麻醉期间使用压力控制机械通气时研究了这些设备的功效,并比较了不同头颈部位置的口咽密封压力。方法每组80例患者接受LTS-D或SLMA进行气道管理。这些患者是在两个不同的机构中招募的。主要的结果变量是中性,屈曲,伸展,左右头颈部位置的口咽密封压力。次要结果变量是达到有效气道的时间,插入的难易程度,尝试次数,插入过程中必要的操作,通气参数,胃管插入的成功率以及并发症的发生率。结果在60?cm H 2 O袖带内压力下,LTS-D达到的口咽密封压力高于SLMA(延伸(p = 0.0150)和正确位置(p = 0.0268 ??)。 LTS-D颈伸时的口咽密封压力明显高于SLMA(p =?0.015),在所有其他位置均检测到相似的口咽密封压力(p =?0.0571)。 LTS-D通气患者的喉咙痛发生率较高(p =?0.527),无重大并发症发生。头颈右和伸展位置?,尽管在中性位置使用压力控制机械通气改变管理似乎没有意义,SLMA的纤维视学效果更好,术后咽痛发生率为在LTS-D中更高。试验注册ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT02856672,唯一协议ID:BnaiZionMC-16-LG-001,注册时间:2016年8月。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号