...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Health Services Research >A systematic review of interventions to enhance access to best practice primary health care for chronic disease management, prevention and episodic care
【24h】

A systematic review of interventions to enhance access to best practice primary health care for chronic disease management, prevention and episodic care

机译:对干预措施的系统评价,以增加获得最佳实践的初级卫生保健的机会,以进行慢性病管理,预防和流行病治疗

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Although primary health care (PHC) is a key component of all health care systems, services are not always readily available, accessible or affordable. This systematic review examines effective strategies to enhance access to best practice processes of PHC in three domains: chronic disease management, prevention and episodic care. Methods An extensive search of bibliographic data bases to identify peer and non-peer reviewed literature was undertaken. Identified papers were screened to identify and classify intervention studies that measured the impact of strategies (singly or in combination) on change in use or the reach of services in defined population groups (evaluated interventions). Results The search identified 3,148 citations of which 121 were intervention studies and 75 were evaluated interventions. Evaluated interventions were found in all three domains: prevention (n?=?45), episodic care (n?=?19), and chronic disease management (n?=?11). They were undertaken in a number of countries including Australia (n?=?25), USA (n?=?25), and UK (n?=?15). Study quality was ranked as high (31% of studies), medium (61%) and low (8%). The 75 evaluated interventions tested a range of strategies either singly (n?=?46 studies) or as a combination of two (n?=?20) or more strategies (n?=?9). Strategies targeted both health providers and patients and were categorised to five groups: practice re-organisation (n?=?43 studies), patient support (n?=?29), provision of new services (n?=?19), workforce development (n?=?11), and financial incentives (n?=?9). Strategies varied by domain, reflecting the complexity of care needs and processes. Of the 75 evaluated interventions, 55 reported positive findings with interventions using a combination of strategies more likely to report positive results. Conclusions This review suggests that multiple, linked strategies targeting different levels of the health care system are most likely to improve access to best practice PHC. The proposed changes in the structure of PHC in Australia may provide opportunities to investigate the factors that influence access to best practice PHC and to develop and implement effective, evidence based strategies to address these.
机译:背景技术尽管初级卫生保健(PHC)是所有卫生保健系统的关键组成部分,但服务并非总是随时可用,可访问或负担得起。这篇系统的综述从三个方面研究了有效的策略,以提高对PHC最佳实践过程的访问:慢性病管理,预防和情节护理。方法对书目数据库进行了广泛搜索,以识别同行和非同行评审的文献。筛选出确定的论文以识别和分类干预研究,这些研究测量了策略(单独或组合)对特定人群的使用变化或服务范围(评估的干预)的影响。结果搜索确定了3,148条被引用的文献,其中121条为干预研究,75条为评估干预。在所有三个领域中均找到了经过评估的干预措施:预防(n = 45),突发性护理(n = 19)和慢性疾病管理(n = 11)。在包括澳大利亚(n = 25),美国(n = 25)和英国(n = 15)在内的多个国家进行了研究。研究质量排名为高(31%的研究),中(61%)和低(8%)。评估的75种干预措施分别测试了一系列策略(n = 46研究),或者将两种策略(n = 20)或更多策略(n = 9)组合在一起。既针对医疗服务提供者又针对患者的策略,分为五类:重组(n = 43研究),患者支持(n = 29),提供新服务(n = 19),劳动力发展(n?=?11)和经济激励(n?=?9)。策略因领域而异,反映了护理需求和流程的复杂性。在评估的75项干预措施中,有55项报告了阳性结果,而干预措施采用了更有可能报告阳性结果的多种策略。结论该评价表明,针对医疗保健系统不同级别的多种链接策略最有可能改善对最佳实践PHC的获取。在澳大利亚,PHC结构的拟议变更可能提供机会,以调查影响获得最佳实践PHC的因素,并制定和实施有效的,基于证据的策略来解决这些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号